The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 is a moderate stability shoe designed for daily training, offering plush cushioning and a comfortable ride. Reviewers noted its dual-density Fresh Foam X midsole delivers balanced shock absorption and energy return, with a heel stack height of 36.8mm. The updated upper features engineered mesh for structure and breathability, though some reviewers found it lacking in durability. RunRepeat's lab tests showed solid performance in cushioning and traction, though they noted the shoe's weight and upper breathability as drawbacks. This shoe is ideal for heel strikers seeking a versatile daily trainer but may not suit those wanting maximum stability or a minimalist feel.
Full review
Stability Innovation and Design
The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 introduces a significant design evolution with its Stability Plane technology, a feature first seen in the Vongo v6. This innovation incorporates a thin EVA stability plate in the midsole that offers flexibility without sacrificing support, according to RunRepeat's lab testing. The shoe's full-length medial wedge is a standout feature, making it one of the few stability shoes on the market with this design. According to Doctors of Running's physical therapist review, the 860 v14 is the only full-length medially wedged running shoe they've encountered, providing moderate to high medial stability throughout the foot. This approach is particularly beneficial for runners who need support from heel to forefoot, as opposed to lateral stability features found in other models. The stability plane technology differentiates the 860 v14 from its predecessor, the 860 v13, which had a more traditional approach to stability. RunRepeat's testing revealed that this new stability method provides a more balanced support system compared to previous versions, though it does add to the shoe's overall weight and complexity.
Cushioning and Comfort Performance
The 860 v14 features a dual-density Fresh Foam X midsole that delivers plush cushioning while maintaining structural support, as confirmed by multiple reviewers. RunRepeat's lab tests measured 126 SA in the heel and 113 SA in the forefoot, which exceeds the average for daily running shoes, according to their ASTM F1976 testing. The heel stack height of 36.8 mm is notably higher than many competitors, making it more cushioned than the Vongo v6, which was a pleasant surprise during testing. Runningshoesguru's reviewer noted that the 860 v14 leans more toward plush comfort compared to previous editions that were more responsive. However, this increased cushioning comes at the cost of weight, with the women's size 8 model weighing 8.2 oz (232 g) according to Shoeexpert.net's testing. The softer top layer of the midsole is designed to be kind to the soles of feet, while the firmer bottom layer provides stability. Runners with neutral gaits, such as Rachel Boswell from Runners World, found the cushioning comfortable but noted it could feel too supportive for those seeking a more dynamic ride. The midsole's thickness is 4mm greater in the forefoot than the v13, which contributes to the overall plushness but also increases the shoe's weight.
Fit and Upper Construction
Fit characteristics vary between reviewers, with some noting the shoe runs slightly short initially but stretching with wear. According to Doctors of Running's physical therapist review, the 860 v14 fits true to size for most runners, though those between sizes should consider going up a half size. The engineered mesh upper provides a good balance of breathability and structure, with a slightly wider midfoot and a more rounded forefoot compared to previous models. The gusseted tongue adds to comfort, and the upper's stretchiness helps accommodate different foot shapes. RunRepeat's testing found the upper to be less durable than expected, with some concerns about the knit material's longevity. The lacing system is described as simple and effective, providing a secure fit without pressure points. However, the upper's breathability is limited, with some reviewers noting that feet can become sweaty during longer runs or warmer conditions. Shoeexpert.net's 8-week testing revealed that while the toe box provides adequate room, it's not spacious enough for runners with larger toes. The heel counter is described as sturdy, though some runners with heel sensitivities should approach with caution due to the stiff counter.
Real-World Performance Testing
In real-world testing, the 860 v14 demonstrates its strengths as a daily trainer with consistent performance across various conditions. RunRepeat's lab tests confirmed that the blown rubber outsole provides good traction in both wet and dry conditions, with a wider base compared to the v13. The outsole's thickness varies by area, maintaining durability while offering good grip. The shoe's 8mm drop creates a defined rocker profile that provides some bounce and propulsion, helping to counteract the slower elements of the shoe's design. RunRepeat's testing showed that the 860 v14 handles both jogging and walking well, with the stability features working subtly to guide foot motion without feeling restrictive. However, Runners World's reviewer noted that the shoe's high level of support and stability can become burdensome over longer distances, limiting it to about 10K runs. The shoe's performance under sustained comfort conditions was praised by Shoeexpert.net, who found it suitable for 10-hour work days and extended wear scenarios. The Stability Plane technology was particularly effective in reducing overpronation during runs, with users reporting less post-run knee discomfort.
Where It Falls Short
Despite its many strengths, the 860 v14 has notable drawbacks that limit its appeal for certain runners. RunRepeat's lab tests revealed that the upper's durability is subpar, with concerns about the knit material's longevity. The shoe's weight is another significant issue, with the women's size 8 model weighing 8.2 oz, which is heavier than many competitors. Runners World's reviewer noted that the shoe's plush cushioning and high support can become too much for lighter runners or those seeking a more dynamic ride. The limited breathability of the upper causes discomfort during longer runs or in warmer conditions, as noted by Shoeexpert.net's testing. Additionally, the shoe's complexity with multiple layers and stability features may not appeal to runners who prefer simpler designs. The 860 v14's performance under sustained use is questionable, with some reviewers suggesting it's not ideal for long-distance racing or high-intensity training. The Stability Plane technology, while innovative, adds complexity that may not be necessary for runners with minimal stability needs.
Who It's Best For
The 860 v14 is best suited for runners seeking a moderate stability shoe that prioritizes comfort and daily training over high-performance racing. According to Runningshoesguru, it's ideal for those who need a stability trainer built for everyday training, particularly heel strikers who want a plush ride with support. RunRepeat's analysis suggests it's excellent for runners who prefer a plush ride paired with support, making it a standout choice for those with moderate stability needs. The shoe is particularly recommended for those who have found the 880 or 1080 series comfortable and are looking for more stability while maintaining familiar comfort. However, it's not recommended for runners who rely heavily on medial post support or those seeking a lightweight, responsive shoe for racing. The 860 v14 is also not ideal for runners with narrow feet or those who prefer a more breathable upper, as the engineered mesh upper has limitations in breathability. For those with specific foot needs, such as those requiring custom orthotics, the 860 v14 integrates well with these devices, according to Shoeexpert.net's testing.
Value and Price Analysis
At $140, the 860 v14 sits in the mid-range of stability shoes, with value considerations varying based on individual needs and preferences. RunRepeat's analysis places it as a solid value for those seeking a blend of stability, cushioning, and comfort, especially considering its reasonable price point. The shoe's performance in daily training and walking scenarios justifies the cost for many users, according to Shoeexpert.net's 8-week testing. However, the added weight and complexity of the Stability Plane technology may not be worth the investment for runners who don't require the specific support features. Runningshoesguru's reviewer notes that while the 860 v14 offers a rebuilt midsole that provides a stable and comfortable ride, it can feel bulky occasionally, which may impact its value proposition. The shoe's durability concerns, particularly in the upper, could lead to higher long-term costs if replacement is needed sooner than expected. For runners who prioritize comfort and support over lightweight performance, the 860 v14 offers good value, but those seeking a more dynamic ride may find better value in alternatives like the ASICS GT 2000 13 or Hoka Arahi.
Comparison to Competitors
The 860 v14 competes directly with models like the ASICS GT 2000 13, Saucony Guide, and Hoka Arahi, each offering different strengths. Compared to the ASICS GT 2000 13, the 860 v14 offers a more plush ride with its dual-density Fresh Foam X midsole, while the GT 2000 13 provides a more predictable and reliable ride according to RunRepeat's analysis. The Saucony Guide is noted for its similar plushness but with a more traditional approach to stability, while the Hoka Arahi offers a more responsive ride with less support. The 860 v14's unique full-length medial wedge sets it apart from competitors, though this feature adds complexity and weight. RunRepeat's testing found the 860 v14 to be more cushioned than the Vongo v6, which is a key differentiator. The 860 v14's 36.8 mm heel stack height is higher than the Vongo v6, making it more cushioned without the added price and heft of premium models. However, the 860 v14's performance under sustained use is questioned, with some reviewers suggesting it's not ideal for long-distance racing or high-intensity training compared to more specialized models.
Strengths
- +Dual-layer Fresh Foam X midsole provides plush cushioning and stable ride
- +Comfortable round fit with more space for feet compared to previous editions
- +Durable blown rubber outsole with good traction in wet and dry conditions
- +Reflective N's on upper improve visibility during night runs
Watch-outs
- −Upper mesh lacks durability and breathability according to reviewers
- −Shoe feels slightly bulky and heavier than expected at 10.5 oz
- −Limited appeal for runners who prefer simpler stability designs
How it compares
The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 offers more plush cushioning than the Saucony Tempus 2 and better durability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the ASICS GT-2000 14 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Guide 18.
Who this is for
At a glance: heel strikers wanting versatile daily training.
Why you’d buy the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
- Dual-layer Fresh Foam X midsole provides plush cushioning and stable ride.
- Comfortable round fit with more space for feet compared to previous editions.
- Durable blown rubber outsole with good traction in wet and dry conditions.
Why you’d skip it
- Upper mesh lacks durability and breathability according to reviewers.
- Shoe feels slightly bulky and heavier than expected at 10.5 oz.
- Limited appeal for runners who prefer simpler stability designs.
Rating sources
Our 4.1 score is the average of these published ratings. More about methodology.
