Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Hoka Gaviota 6 comes out ahead by a clear margin (4.7 vs 4.1). The gap is mostly about runners with wide feet needing maximum stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6

4.7

$180

The Hoka Gaviota 6 represents a long-awaited update to a popular stability shoe, offering improved fit and stability features. Reviewers noted its roomy, wide-fit design and excellent medial support, with the engineered mesh upper providing comfort and security. However, lab tests revealed that the CMEVA foam feels outdated, delivering poor shock absorption and low energy return. While it's lighter than most maximal stability shoes, the performance doesn't justify the $180 price point for many runners. The shoe is best suited for those needing maximum stability and wide-foot accommodation, but those seeking a more lively ride should consider alternatives like the Saucony Hurricane 24 or Nike Structure Plus.

Strengths

— Roomy fit compared with most HOKA models, especially accommodating for wide feet
— Excellent stability with full-length H-frame support that provides strong medial stability
— Light weight for a maximal stack height stability shoe at 10 oz

Watch-outs

— Outdated CMEVA foam delivers disappointing shock absorption and energy return
— High price for the performance offered, especially when compared to newer alternatives
— Heel bevel angled medially, which may cause slight firmness in ride

$180 · Buy at hoka.com Full review →

Ranked #6 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

4.1

$140

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 is a moderate stability shoe designed for daily training, offering plush cushioning and a comfortable ride. Reviewers noted its dual-density Fresh Foam X midsole delivers balanced shock absorption and energy return, with a heel stack height of 36.8mm. The updated upper features engineered mesh for structure and breathability, though some reviewers found it lacking in durability. RunRepeat's lab tests showed solid performance in cushioning and traction, though they noted the shoe's weight and upper breathability as drawbacks. This shoe is ideal for heel strikers seeking a versatile daily trainer but may not suit those wanting maximum stability or a minimalist feel.

Strengths

— Dual-layer Fresh Foam X midsole provides plush cushioning and stable ride
— Comfortable round fit with more space for feet compared to previous editions
— Durable blown rubber outsole with good traction in wet and dry conditions

Watch-outs

— Upper mesh lacks durability and breathability according to reviewers
— Shoe feels slightly bulky and heavier than expected at 10.5 oz
— Limited appeal for runners who prefer simpler stability designs

$140 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

Hoka Gaviota 6

The Hoka Gaviota 6 provides a roomier fit and better stability than the Saucony Tempus 2, but its outdated CMEVA foam delivers poor shock absorption compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14. It's also more expensive than the Saucony Guide 18 despite offering less energy return.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 offers more plush cushioning than the Saucony Tempus 2 and better durability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the ASICS GT-2000 14 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Hoka Gaviota 6	New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
Weight	10 oz / 283g	10.5 oz (298 g)
Stack Height	39mm heel / 33mm forefoot	38 mm
Drop	6mm	8 mm
Midsole	CMEVA and PROFLY+	Fresh Foam X
Stability	J-Frame	Medial post
Arch Support	Moderate	Moderate

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet