Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 vs Saucony Tempus 2

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Saucony Tempus 2 comes out ahead by a clear margin (4.1 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about runners with narrow feet wanting energy return — read the strengths below before deciding.

Ranked #6 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

4.1

$140

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 is a moderate stability shoe designed for daily training, offering plush cushioning and a comfortable ride. Reviewers noted its dual-density Fresh Foam X midsole delivers balanced shock absorption and energy return, with a heel stack height of 36.8mm. The updated upper features engineered mesh for structure and breathability, though some reviewers found it lacking in durability. RunRepeat's lab tests showed solid performance in cushioning and traction, though they noted the shoe's weight and upper breathability as drawbacks. This shoe is ideal for heel strikers seeking a versatile daily trainer but may not suit those wanting maximum stability or a minimalist feel.

Strengths

— Dual-layer Fresh Foam X midsole provides plush cushioning and stable ride
— Comfortable round fit with more space for feet compared to previous editions
— Durable blown rubber outsole with good traction in wet and dry conditions

Watch-outs

— Upper mesh lacks durability and breathability according to reviewers
— Shoe feels slightly bulky and heavier than expected at 10.5 oz
— Limited appeal for runners who prefer simpler stability designs

$140 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Tempus 2

4.5

$159

The Saucony Tempus 2 maintains its position as one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, featuring the energetic PWRRUN PB foam that delivers strong energy return. Reviewers praised its stability and durability, with RunRepeat calling it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers seeking a responsive daily trainer. However, the shoe's snug fit, particularly in the forefoot, and lack of breathability were common complaints. DOCTORS OF RUNNING noted the tapered toe box could cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short for a secure fit. This shoe is best suited for runners with narrow to standard feet who prioritize stability and energy return over cushioning and breathability.

Strengths

— Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
— Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
— Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support

Watch-outs

— Poor breathability in upper mesh
— Slightly heavier than previous version
— Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box

$159 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 offers more plush cushioning than the Saucony Tempus 2 and better durability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the ASICS GT-2000 14 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Guide 18.

Saucony Tempus 2

The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14	Saucony Tempus 2
Weight	10.5 oz (298 g)	9.3 oz
Stack Height	38 mm	38 mm
Drop	8 mm	8 mm
Midsole	Fresh Foam X	PWRRUN PB
Stability	Medial post	Neutral
Arch Support	Moderate	Medium

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet