Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14 vs New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

ASICS GT-2000 14 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.2 vs 4.1). The gap is mostly about runners wanting balanced support and durability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14

4.2

$140

The ASICS GT-2000 14 remains a reliable stability shoe, with RTINGS.com calling it 'one of the most dependable stability shoes you can buy.' The switch to FF Blast Max foam improves shock absorption and energy return compared to previous versions, while the outsole offers exceptional durability. However, the narrow and tapered toebox limits ventilation and may feel restrictive for some runners, as noted by both RunRepeat and Doctors of Running. This shoe is best suited for runners with moderate to high stability needs who want a balanced, supportive daily trainer rather than those seeking maximum cushioning or a more energetic ride.

Strengths

— Improved FF Blast Max foam provides stronger shock absorption with 132 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot
— Outstanding outsole durability with dependable traction for everyday use
— Full-length medial stability system offers consistent support from heel to forefoot

Watch-outs

— Tapered toebox may feel restrictive and limits toe splay, especially for those needing extra room
— Limited breathability due to dense upper material, which can feel warm during long runs

$140 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Ranked #6 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

4.1

$140

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 is a moderate stability shoe designed for daily training, offering plush cushioning and a comfortable ride. Reviewers noted its dual-density Fresh Foam X midsole delivers balanced shock absorption and energy return, with a heel stack height of 36.8mm. The updated upper features engineered mesh for structure and breathability, though some reviewers found it lacking in durability. RunRepeat's lab tests showed solid performance in cushioning and traction, though they noted the shoe's weight and upper breathability as drawbacks. This shoe is ideal for heel strikers seeking a versatile daily trainer but may not suit those wanting maximum stability or a minimalist feel.

Strengths

— Dual-layer Fresh Foam X midsole provides plush cushioning and stable ride
— Comfortable round fit with more space for feet compared to previous editions
— Durable blown rubber outsole with good traction in wet and dry conditions

Watch-outs

— Upper mesh lacks durability and breathability according to reviewers
— Shoe feels slightly bulky and heavier than expected at 10.5 oz
— Limited appeal for runners who prefer simpler stability designs

$140 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

ASICS GT-2000 14

The ASICS GT-2000 14 offers better shock absorption than the Hoka Arahi 8 and provides more consistent support from heel to forefoot than the Saucony Guide 18. However, it's less breathable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and has a more restrictive toebox than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14

The New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 offers more plush cushioning than the Saucony Tempus 2 and better durability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the ASICS GT-2000 14 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	ASICS GT-2000 14	New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14
Weight	9.6 oz / 273 g (men's size 9)	10.5 oz (298 g)
Stack Height	36.5 mm heel / 28.5 mm forefoot	38 mm
Drop	8 mm	8 mm
Midsole	FF Blast Max foam	Fresh Foam X
Stability	GuideTrac	Medial post
Arch Support	Medium	Moderate

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet