The Saucony Tempus 2 maintains its position as one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, featuring the energetic PWRRUN PB foam that delivers strong energy return. Reviewers praised its stability and durability, with RunRepeat calling it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers seeking a responsive daily trainer. However, the shoe's snug fit, particularly in the forefoot, and lack of breathability were common complaints. DOCTORS OF RUNNING noted the tapered toe box could cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short for a secure fit. This shoe is best suited for runners with narrow to standard feet who prioritize stability and energy return over cushioning and breathability.
Full review
Performance Stability Focus
The Saucony Tempus 2 represents a refined approach to performance stability, maintaining the core elements that made its predecessor appealing while introducing subtle improvements. According to Dr. Matthew Klein of Doctors of Running, the Tempus 2 "remains one of the few lighter stability shoes" in the market, particularly suited for runners seeking to combine stability with speed. The shoe's design emphasizes a dynamic performance stability shoe for uptempo training and longer distance racing. The PWRRUN PB foam, which provides a centered ride from heel to toe, remains a key feature. RTINGS noted that the Tempus 2's PWRRUN PB foam delivers strong energy return, measuring 69.9% in the heel and 72.2% in the forefoot. This energy return, combined with the firm PWRRUN frame, creates a responsive yet stable ride that excels during faster efforts.
RunRepeat's Carlos Sánchez highlighted that the Tempus 2 "does not reinvent the series," but this is seen as a positive, especially for runners who value consistency and dependability. The shoe's ability to handle both easy runs and uptempo efforts makes it a versatile daily trainer. The PWRRUN PB foam, which is PEBA-based, delivers excellent energy return, while the PWRRUN EVA-based frame adds support and durability. This dual-density foam construction is designed to offer a plush yet responsive ride, with the firmness of the PWRRUN layer providing stability without overly compromising speed. However, the midfoot feels firmer than expected, which may affect comfort for some runners, particularly those unaccustomed to stability shoes.
Fit and Comfort Details
Fit is a critical aspect of the Saucony Tempus 2, with multiple reviewers noting its snug characteristics. Dr. Klein reported that the fit is snug, particularly in the forefoot and toe box, with a tapered toe box that can cause mild abrasion on bare skin. The toe box is described as tapering, especially on the lateral side, which can put pressure on the fifth toe. The forefoot is slightly snug and transitions into a slightly snug midfoot. The volume of the forefoot and midfoot is on the lower side, with a secure and moderately thick engineered mesh. The tongue is moderately thick and strongly gusseted, contributing to midfoot lockdown. However, the tongue does not do a great job of protecting the dorsal part of the foot, and reviewers suggest not tying the laces too tight to avoid discomfort.
RunRepeat's review emphasized that the Tempus 2 has a narrow fit, particularly in the forefoot. The upper features a new engineered mesh that provides a secure but snug fit, slightly faster feel. The lacing system is described as feeling a touch short, requiring almost every bit of lace available to achieve a secure fit. The laces sit fairly high up on the tongue, which can bring the heel collar in slightly and occasionally be noticeable, especially when going uphill. The midfoot features a moderately thick and strongly gusseted tongue, which adds to the midfoot lockdown. The heel counter is thick and stiff, which may be noticeable for those with heel sensitivities. The overall fit is described as secure and stable, but the narrowness may not suit all foot types, particularly those with wider feet.
Cushioning and Ride Quality
The cushioning of the Saucony Tempus 2 is a blend of PWRRUN PB and PWRRUN foams, creating a responsive yet stable ride. According to RunRepeat, the Tempus 2 benefits from using a superfoam like PWRRUN PB, which delivers excellent energy return. The energy return was measured at 69.9% in the heel and 72.2% in the forefoot, which are strong numbers that clearly expand what the shoe can do. The ride is described as lively and energetic, with a firm PWRRUN layer that provides stability without overly compromising speed. The midsole's dual-density foam construction blends PWRRUN PB and PWRRUN foams for a plush yet responsive ride. The PWRRUN PB foam is PEBA-based and provides a highly resilient ride, while the PWRRUN EVA-based foam frame adds support and durability.
Outdoor Gear Lab's review noted that the Tempus 2 has 38 mm of foam in the heel and 28 mm in the forefoot, giving it a 10 mm heel-to-toe drop. The ride is described as smooth and comfortable, with the midfoot feeling firmer than expected due to the chunk of PWRRUN foam placed under the arch. While the heel and forefoot feel lively, the midfoot is firmer, which may affect comfort for some runners. The shoe is comfortable for long runs and easy miles, versatile enough to handle workouts, and some runners might find it works as a race shoe. However, the firmness through the midfoot may cause some discomfort, particularly for runners not used to stability shoes.
Upper Construction and Breathability
The upper construction of the Saucony Tempus 2 features a new engineered mesh that provides a secure but snug fit. RunRepeat noted that the upper is both breathable and lightweight, offering a medium amount of support and structure. The form-fitting design of the upper comfortably hugs the foot without feeling restrictive, thanks in part to seamless overlays that reinforce the fit and keep it secure without adding weight. The Lace Loop System helps ensure the laces stay snug and evenly distributed across the foot, preventing discomfort caused by pressure points. The heel collar and tongue are padded enough to offer comfort but not so much that they feel overly bulky, keeping the overall fit while still providing enough cushion to prevent irritation.
However, breathability is a point of contention. RunRepeat highlighted that breathability and weight are real downgrades, and these issues were easily avoidable. The upper, while secure and supportive, is described as not particularly breathable, which can be a drawback in warm conditions. The engineered mesh, while lightweight, does not provide the breathability that some runners might expect from a shoe in this category. The snug fit, while beneficial for stability, can also contribute to a lack of airflow, especially during longer runs in hot weather.
Stability and Support Features
The stability features of the Saucony Tempus 2 are centered around the PWRRUN support frame, which provides asymmetrical design that runs along the medial side to guide the foot when it overpronates. This design replaces the traditional medial post, offering a more subtle but effective form of support. Dr. Klein noted that the shoe's stability features are "one of the few lighter stability shoes" and that the Tempus 2 "remains the lightest of the moderate stability shoes." The PWRRUN frame integrates with the PWRRUN PB to provide stability and responsiveness, with the stiffer midfoot providing support without overly compromising speed.
Outdoor Gear Lab's review emphasized that the Tempus 2 excels at providing stability, and it's the most supportive shoe in their lineup. The PWRRUN frame provides significant medial support, and the asymmetrical design helps keep feet moving forward. The shoe is designed to be a responsive stability shoe, and it is, with above-average responsiveness for a daily trainer. The stability component is a Pwrrun frame which has an asymmetrical design that runs along the medial side. It’s that take-it-when-you-need-it support we’ve been seeing in stability shoes since brands phased out obtrusive medial posts. The Tempus 2’s stability component is a Pwrrun frame which has an asymmetrical design that runs along the medial side.
Where It Falls Short
Despite its strengths, the Saucony Tempus 2 has several drawbacks that reviewers have noted. The most commonly cited issue is the narrow fit, particularly in the forefoot. RunRepeat and Runners' World both emphasized that the Tempus 2 is narrow, with testers reporting cramped toes and recommending going up a size for a roomier fit. The snug midfoot and toe box can be uncomfortable for runners with wider feet or those who prefer more space in their shoes. Additionally, the upper is described as not particularly breathable, which can be a problem during long or hot runs. The firmness of the midfoot, while providing stability, can also be a point of discomfort for some runners.
Another concern is the weight, which is slightly heavier than the previous version. RunRepeat noted a slight weight increase, and Outdoor Gear Lab reported that the shoe weighs 9.11 ounces size 10.5, which is slightly better than average for a daily trainer but still heavier than some runners might prefer. The weight, while not excessive, can be a factor for runners who prioritize lightweight shoes for speedwork or racing. Additionally, the outsole traction, while solid, is described as moderate compared to other shoes in the market. The XT-900 Carbon Rubber outsole provides good traction in all conditions and surfaces, but it is not the most grippy option available.
Who It's Best For
The Saucony Tempus 2 is best suited for runners who need a lightweight stability shoe with excellent energy return and a responsive ride. It's particularly ideal for those who value stability and performance, especially during uptempo training and longer distance racing. RunRepeat's review highlighted that the Tempus 2 is a very solid choice for heel strikers who want a stability shoe that feels lively and responsive underfoot. The shoe is also recommended for runners in cold climates looking for a supportive, grippy, and comfortable daily trainer. The Tempus 2 is also a strong contender for runners who can't find version 1 anymore and want the same stable and dependable feel. Runners who can't find version 1 anymore and want the same stable and dependable feel are encouraged to try the Tempus 2.
However, the Tempus 2 is not ideal for runners with wide feet or those who prefer a more spacious toe box. RunRepeat and Runners' World both noted that the fit is narrow, and testers recommended going up a size for a roomier fit. Runners who prioritize maximum cushioning or shock absorption may also find the Tempus 2 falls short compared to models like the Saucony Hurricane 25 or the ASICS Gel Kayano 32. The shoe is also not recommended for runners chasing a max-stack shoe, as its design stays closer to older standards and does not meet today's high-cushion trend.
Comparison to Alternatives
When compared to alternatives like the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24, the Saucony Tempus 2 stands out for its use of superfoam cushioning and a rocker profile that's ideal for speed workouts. Runners' World noted that the Tempus 2 has super foam cushioning, which the Adrenaline GTS 24 lacks. The Tempus 2's Pwrrun PB foam is PEBA-based and provides exceptionally responsive cushioning, while the Adrenaline GTS 24 uses DNA Loft v3 foam, which is nitrogen-infused EVA foam and is more plush. The Tempus 2 also has a more performance-oriented design, with a slightly lighter weight and a more responsive ride, making it better suited for faster running. However, the Adrenaline GTS 24 is praised for its plush cushioning and comfort, which may be more appealing to runners who prioritize comfort over speed.
In comparison to the ASICS Kayano 32, the Tempus 2 offers a more lightweight option with a responsive ride. The Kayano 32 is known for its maximum cushioning and support, making it ideal for runners who need significant shock absorption. The Tempus 2, while still providing good support, is more focused on performance and speed. The Tempus 2's dual-density foam construction provides a balance between cushioning and responsiveness, while the Kayano 32's design prioritizes comfort and stability. The Tempus 2 is also more affordable than the Kayano 32, making it a more accessible option for runners who want performance without the premium price tag.
Strengths
- +Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
- +Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
- +Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support
- +Durable and grippy outsole
Watch-outs
- −Poor breathability in upper mesh
- −Slightly heavier than previous version
- −Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box
How it compares
The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.
Who this is for
At a glance: runners with narrow feet wanting energy return.
Why you’d buy the Saucony Tempus 2
- Lightest superfoam stability shoe available.
- Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam.
- Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support.
Why you’d skip it
- Poor breathability in upper mesh.
- Slightly heavier than previous version.
- Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box.
Rating sources
Our 4.5 score is the average of these published ratings. More about methodology.
