Verdict
All guidesMethodologyAboutContact
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Hurricane 25 vs Saucony Tempus 2

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Saucony Tempus 2 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about runners with narrow feet wanting energy return — read the strengths below before deciding.

Saucony Hurricane 25
Ranked #8 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Hurricane 25
$169

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers impressive gains in energy return, cushioning, and comfort while shedding a full ounce of weight, according to RunRepeat's lab tests. Doctors of Running praised its bouncy, soft ride and lighter profile compared to previous versions, though they noted the shoe can feel mushy and less stable due to its softer midsole. The redesigned midsole and improved geometry provide a smoother ride than the Hurricane 24, making it ideal for daily trainers seeking plush comfort and stability. However, reviewers criticized its lack of breathability and bulkiness, which may not suit runners prioritizing agility or budget-conscious buyers. This shoe is best for those who value maximal cushioning and stability over lightweight responsiveness.

Strengths
  • — Fantastic energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • — Lighter than previous version at 10 oz
  • — Excellent cushioning for long miles with 151 SA heel shock absorption
Watch-outs
  • — Price hike from previous version at $169.95
  • — Poor breathability due to flat knit upper
  • — Lacks agility and feels clunky for transitions
$169 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →
Saucony Tempus 2
Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Tempus 2
$159

The Saucony Tempus 2 maintains its position as one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, featuring the energetic PWRRUN PB foam that delivers strong energy return. Reviewers praised its stability and durability, with RunRepeat calling it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers seeking a responsive daily trainer. However, the shoe's snug fit, particularly in the forefoot, and lack of breathability were common complaints. DOCTORS OF RUNNING noted the tapered toe box could cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short for a secure fit. This shoe is best suited for runners with narrow to standard feet who prioritize stability and energy return over cushioning and breathability.

Strengths
  • — Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
  • — Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • — Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support
Watch-outs
  • — Poor breathability in upper mesh
  • — Slightly heavier than previous version
  • — Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box
$159 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →

How they stack up

Saucony Hurricane 25

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers better energy return than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and provides more stability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Tempus 2. Compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14, it offers a more responsive ride but less consistent support.

Saucony Tempus 2

The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

SpecSaucony Hurricane 25Saucony Tempus 2
Weight10 oz / 283g9.3 oz
Stack Height40.2 mm38 mm
Drop7.1 mm8 mm
MidsolePWRRUN PB foamPWRRUN PB
StabilityGuidesoleNeutral
Arch SupportMediumMedium
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet