Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14 vs Saucony Tempus 2

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Saucony Tempus 2 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.2 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about runners with narrow feet wanting energy return — read the strengths below before deciding.

Ranked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14

4.2

$140

The ASICS GT-2000 14 remains a reliable stability shoe, with RTINGS.com calling it 'one of the most dependable stability shoes you can buy.' The switch to FF Blast Max foam improves shock absorption and energy return compared to previous versions, while the outsole offers exceptional durability. However, the narrow and tapered toebox limits ventilation and may feel restrictive for some runners, as noted by both RunRepeat and Doctors of Running. This shoe is best suited for runners with moderate to high stability needs who want a balanced, supportive daily trainer rather than those seeking maximum cushioning or a more energetic ride.

Strengths

— Improved FF Blast Max foam provides stronger shock absorption with 132 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot
— Outstanding outsole durability with dependable traction for everyday use
— Full-length medial stability system offers consistent support from heel to forefoot

Watch-outs

— Tapered toebox may feel restrictive and limits toe splay, especially for those needing extra room
— Limited breathability due to dense upper material, which can feel warm during long runs

$140 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Tempus 2

4.5

$159

The Saucony Tempus 2 maintains its position as one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, featuring the energetic PWRRUN PB foam that delivers strong energy return. Reviewers praised its stability and durability, with RunRepeat calling it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers seeking a responsive daily trainer. However, the shoe's snug fit, particularly in the forefoot, and lack of breathability were common complaints. DOCTORS OF RUNNING noted the tapered toe box could cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short for a secure fit. This shoe is best suited for runners with narrow to standard feet who prioritize stability and energy return over cushioning and breathability.

Strengths

— Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
— Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
— Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support

Watch-outs

— Poor breathability in upper mesh
— Slightly heavier than previous version
— Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box

$159 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

ASICS GT-2000 14

The ASICS GT-2000 14 offers better shock absorption than the Hoka Arahi 8 and provides more consistent support from heel to forefoot than the Saucony Guide 18. However, it's less breathable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and has a more restrictive toebox than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Saucony Tempus 2

The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	ASICS GT-2000 14	Saucony Tempus 2
Weight	9.6 oz / 273 g (men's size 9)	9.3 oz
Stack Height	36.5 mm heel / 28.5 mm forefoot	38 mm
Drop	8 mm	8 mm
Midsole	FF Blast Max foam	PWRRUN PB
Stability	GuideTrac	Neutral
Arch Support	Medium	Medium

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet