Verdict
Ranked #3 of 5Aggregated review·2 sources·updated October 9, 2026

Beatbot Sora 70 Robotic Pool Cleaner

Averaged from 2 published ratings
The verdict

The Beatbot Sora 70 cleans the floor, walls, waterline and water surface in one cordless robot, then floats to the pool edge to be collected. Bob Vila rated it 4.5 out of 5 after a month in a Florida pool and PCMag rated it 4.0 (Excellent) after half a summer of testing. PCMag saw some missed spots, and Bob Vila notes it does not skim continuously like a dedicated solar skimmer.

Beatbot Sora 70 Robotic Pool Cleaner

Full review

One robot for the surface and the floor

Bob Vila's reviewer ran the Sora 70 every three to four days for about a month in an in-ground Florida pool and found it handled surface debris and deeper cleaning in a single cycle, which he found more convenient than pairing a floor robot with a separate skimmer. He rated it 4.5 out of 5 and called it one of the most complete solutions he has tested.

PCMag rated it 4.0 (Excellent) after testing it for the first half of the summer, reporting that it consistently left the surface, walls and waterline spotless and collected the vast majority of debris from the floor.

Design and convenience

PCMag describes a 22.9-pound robot with four bottom roller brushes and 18 sensors, including two AI ultrasonic sensors, that can climb walls and clean platforms in as little as eight inches of water. When a cycle ends it floats to the pool edge. Bob Vila liked that smart parking and noted that waiting for it to expel water at the edge makes it lighter to lift out.

Bob Vila found the internal debris basket large and easy to lift out and rinse, and setup took about five minutes including a firmware update.

Where it falls short

PCMag saw some missed spots, and its app navigation only works when the robot is out of the water. PCMag still prefers the Dreame Z1 Pro as its Editors' Choice for owners willing to skim the surface themselves, because of its stronger suction and underwater control. Bob Vila points out that the Sora 70 does not replace a solar skimmer that runs around the clock.

Strengths

  • +Cleans the surface, walls, waterline and floor in one cycle, per Bob Vila and PCMag
  • +Parks itself at the pool edge when finished, so it does not have to be fished out of the deep end
  • +Large, easy-to-empty debris basket with fine mesh filters, per Bob Vila
  • +Handles platforms in as little as eight inches of water, per PCMag
  • +Bob Vila had it set up in about five minutes, including a firmware update

Watch-outs

  • −PCMag saw some missed spots in testing
  • −App navigation only works when the robot is out of the water, per PCMag
  • −It does not skim continuously, so it does not replace a 24/7 solar skimmer, per Bob Vila
  • −Heavy to lift out if you do not let it drain at the edge first (22.9 lb dry, per PCMag)

How it compares

Unlike the Dreame Z1 Pro, the Sora 70 skims the water surface; PCMag found the Dreame has stronger suction and can be steered underwater, which the Sora 70 cannot. At $1,199 it costs less than the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra ($2,299) and Aiper Scuba X1 Pro Max ($1,700) listed on this page.

Rating sources

Our 4.2 score is the average of these published ratings, each adjusted for how strictly its publisher scores. More about methodology.

How it compares

See all 5 →
Dreame Z1 Pro Robotic Pool Cleaner
#1 · Top Pick

Dreame Z1 Pro Robotic Pool Cleaner

The Dreame Z1 Pro Robotic Pool Cleaner is rated at 8,000 GPH of suction, close to the 8500 GPH of the Aiper Scuba X1 Pro Max, and costs less than the Aiper. Its 3-hour runtime compares with 5 hours of floor cleaning for the Aiper and a 2-hour cycle for the Dolphin Nautilus CC Plus Wi-Fi. It works very slowly, and its remote control is awkward to use.

Dolphin Nautilus CC Plus Wi-Fi
#2

Dolphin Nautilus CC Plus Wi-Fi

The Dolphin Nautilus CC Plus Wi-Fi has stayed reliable over a year of ownership, where the Aiper Scuba X1 Pro Max sporadically stops cleaning and the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra Robotic Pool Cleaner recharges constantly during sessions. Its cleaning cycle runs 2 hours, against 3 hours of runtime on the Dreame Z1 Pro Robotic Pool Cleaner. It costs less than the Aiper and the Beatbot and lacks the newer Gen-2 NanoFilters.

Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra Robotic Pool Cleaner
#4

Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra Robotic Pool Cleaner

The Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra Robotic Pool Cleaner covers surface, floor, walls, waterline and water clarification in one unit, but its suction is described as weak where the Dreame Z1 Pro Robotic Pool Cleaner is rated at 8,000 GPH and the Aiper Scuba X1 Pro Max at 8500 GPH. It recharges constantly during cleaning sessions. It costs more than every other cleaner on this page.

Aiper Scuba X1 Pro Max
#5

Aiper Scuba X1 Pro Max

The Aiper Scuba X1 Pro Max covers up to 3,230 square feet and runs 5 hours on floor cleaning, against 2,160 sq ft and 3 hours for the Dreame Z1 Pro Robotic Pool Cleaner. It costs more than the Dreame and less than the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra Robotic Pool Cleaner. Its connection becomes unreliable when the battery drops below 25%, and it sporadically stops cleaning.

Beatbot Sora 70 Robotic Pool Cleaner
4.2/5· $1,199
Buy at beatbot.com
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission. Rankings are not affected.