Verdict
All guidesResearchMethodologyAboutContact
Head-to-head · Best Mirrorless Cameras For Travel

Sony α6700 vs Sony α7 IV

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.
The short answer

Sony α7 IV comes out ahead by a clear margin (3.9 vs 4.4). The gap is mostly about Hybrid photo and video shooters — read the strengths below before deciding.

Sony α6700
Ranked #9 in Best Mirrorless Cameras For Travel
Sony α6700
6 sources2 derived$1,498as of Aug 1

The Sony α6700 is a high-end APS-C mirrorless camera with a 26MP BSI CMOS sensor and Bionz XR processor that includes dedicated AI processing. Reviews highlight its improved video, including 4K/60p recording and 10-bit color depth, plus an upgraded 3" fully articulating LCD. It keeps the 11 fps shooting rate but drops the focus point joystick, which some users find limiting for manual control. Handling and weather sealing earn praise; the single card slot is the notable drawback for professional use. Enthusiasts who want advanced video and image quality in a compact form factor are the fit.

Strengths
  • — 26MP BSI CMOS sensor with 93% AF coverage
  • — 11 fps shooting with mechanical or electronic shutter
  • — Full-articulated 3" LCD with 1.04M dot resolution
Watch-outs
  • — No focus point joystick for manual AF point selection
  • — Single SD card slot lacking backup option
$1,498 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →
Sony α7 IV
Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Mirrorless Cameras For Travel
Sony α7 IV
4 sources$2,198as of Aug 1

The Sony α7 IV is a full-frame mirrorless camera built around a 33MP back-illuminated Exmor R CMOS sensor and Sony's BIONZ XR processor, with Fast Hybrid AF across 759 phase-detection points, 5-axis in-body stabilization and 4K 60p 10-bit 4:2:2 video. Only one review cited on this page tested this generation of the camera: wedding and portrait photographer Myles Katherine, who scored it 87 out of 100, found it "intuitive" and "user-friendly", praised the dual card slots and low-light handling, and shot a six-hour wedding on a single charge. Her reservations are specific rather than general: the electronic viewfinder image "just isn't the best", there is no built-in multiple exposure function, which she calls a dealbreaker for her own work, and the battery "died really quickly" once it dropped below about 11 percent. At roughly 658 g it is a hybrid stills-and-video body rather than the lightest thing in this guide.

Strengths
  • — 33MP full-frame Exmor R CMOS sensor resolves noticeably more detail than the 24MP generation it replaced
  • — BIONZ XR image processing engine, which Sony rates at up to 8x the processing performance of the engine it replaces
  • — 0.5-type Quad-VGA OLED viewfinder with 100% coverage and 3,686,400 dots
Watch-outs
  • — Electronic viewfinder image quality underwhelms: Myles Katherine, who shoots through the finder, found "the quality of the image in the electronic viewfinder just isn't the best"
  • — Multiple exposures must be assembled later in software; Myles Katherine calls the absent in-camera function "a dealbreaker" for her own work
  • — Battery falls off a cliff at the end of its charge: Myles Katherine found that "once it got to about 11% battery, it died really quickly after that"
$2,198 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →

Derived means the reviewer published no score, so one was inferred from their written verdict. Everything else is a number the publisher printed. How we rank.

How they stack up

Sony α6700

The Sony α6700 surpasses the Canon EOS R50 in video features with 10-bit color depth and 4K/60p recording, but unlike the Fujifilm X-T5, it lacks the higher frame rate and in-body stabilization. Compared to the Sony α6400, it has a more advanced processor and better video specs, though it lacks the 425 AF points and 11 fps shooting rate.

Sony α7 IV

The Sony α7 IV is the only full-frame camera in this guide: against the APS-C Canon EOS R50 it brings a 33MP full-frame sensor and 5-axis in-body stabilization the R50 does not have at all. It matches the Fujifilm X-S20's 4K/60 10-bit 4:2:2 video rather than lacking it, but the X-S20 weighs 413 g against the α7 IV's 658 g, and for a travel buyer that is the trade actually being made. Against the Nikon Z5II it is the lighter body (658 g against 700 g) with the higher-resolution sensor (33MP against 24MP), while the Z5II shoots faster bursts (11 fps against 10 fps); both cameras have two card slots.

Specs side-by-side

SpecSony α6700Sony α7 IV
Sensor26MP BSI CMOS APS-C33MP full-frame Exmor R CMOS (35.9 x 23.9 mm)
Stabilization5-axis in-body optical image stabilization5-axis in-body image stabilization
Video4K/60p, 10-bit with 4:2:2 color4K 60p 10-bit 4:2:2 (Super 35 crop), full width to 4K 30p
Autofocus759 with 93% coverageFast Hybrid AF, 759 phase-detection points (full frame)
Burst Rate11 fps with mechanical or electronic shutter10 fps
Display3" 1.04m-dot fully articulating touchscreen3.0-type vari-angle touchscreen TFT, 1,036,800 dots
EVF2.36m-dot, 0.7x OLED EVF0.5-type Quad-VGA OLED, 3,686,400 dots, 100% coverage
Weight493 g658 g
← See the full ranking of best mirrorless cameras for travel