Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6 vs Saucony Tempus 2

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Hoka Gaviota 6 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.7 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about runners with wide feet needing maximum stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6

4.7

$180

The Hoka Gaviota 6 represents a long-awaited update to a popular stability shoe, offering improved fit and stability features. Reviewers noted its roomy, wide-fit design and excellent medial support, with the engineered mesh upper providing comfort and security. However, lab tests revealed that the CMEVA foam feels outdated, delivering poor shock absorption and low energy return. While it's lighter than most maximal stability shoes, the performance doesn't justify the $180 price point for many runners. The shoe is best suited for those needing maximum stability and wide-foot accommodation, but those seeking a more lively ride should consider alternatives like the Saucony Hurricane 24 or Nike Structure Plus.

Strengths

— Roomy fit compared with most HOKA models, especially accommodating for wide feet
— Excellent stability with full-length H-frame support that provides strong medial stability
— Light weight for a maximal stack height stability shoe at 10 oz

Watch-outs

— Outdated CMEVA foam delivers disappointing shock absorption and energy return
— High price for the performance offered, especially when compared to newer alternatives
— Heel bevel angled medially, which may cause slight firmness in ride

$180 · Buy at hoka.com Full review →

Ranked #1 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Tempus 2

4.5

$159

The Saucony Tempus 2 maintains its position as one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, featuring the energetic PWRRUN PB foam that delivers strong energy return. Reviewers praised its stability and durability, with RunRepeat calling it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers seeking a responsive daily trainer. However, the shoe's snug fit, particularly in the forefoot, and lack of breathability were common complaints. DOCTORS OF RUNNING noted the tapered toe box could cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short for a secure fit. This shoe is best suited for runners with narrow to standard feet who prioritize stability and energy return over cushioning and breathability.

Strengths

— Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
— Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
— Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support

Watch-outs

— Poor breathability in upper mesh
— Slightly heavier than previous version
— Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box

$159 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

Hoka Gaviota 6

The Hoka Gaviota 6 provides a roomier fit and better stability than the Saucony Tempus 2, but its outdated CMEVA foam delivers poor shock absorption compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14. It's also more expensive than the Saucony Guide 18 despite offering less energy return.

Saucony Tempus 2

The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Hoka Gaviota 6	Saucony Tempus 2
Weight	10 oz / 283g	9.3 oz
Stack Height	39mm heel / 33mm forefoot	38 mm
Drop	6mm	8 mm
Midsole	CMEVA and PROFLY+	PWRRUN PB
Stability	J-Frame	Neutral
Arch Support	Moderate	Medium

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet