Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6 vs Saucony Guide 18

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Hoka Gaviota 6 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.7 vs 4.4). The gap is mostly about runners with wide feet needing maximum stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6

4.7

$180

The Hoka Gaviota 6 represents a long-awaited update to a popular stability shoe, offering improved fit and stability features. Reviewers noted its roomy, wide-fit design and excellent medial support, with the engineered mesh upper providing comfort and security. However, lab tests revealed that the CMEVA foam feels outdated, delivering poor shock absorption and low energy return. While it's lighter than most maximal stability shoes, the performance doesn't justify the $180 price point for many runners. The shoe is best suited for those needing maximum stability and wide-foot accommodation, but those seeking a more lively ride should consider alternatives like the Saucony Hurricane 24 or Nike Structure Plus.

Strengths

— Roomy fit compared with most HOKA models, especially accommodating for wide feet
— Excellent stability with full-length H-frame support that provides strong medial stability
— Light weight for a maximal stack height stability shoe at 10 oz

Watch-outs

— Outdated CMEVA foam delivers disappointing shock absorption and energy return
— High price for the performance offered, especially when compared to newer alternatives
— Heel bevel angled medially, which may cause slight firmness in ride

$180 · Buy at hoka.com Full review →

Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Guide 18

4.4

$140

The Saucony Guide 18 delivers dependable stability and pronation control, with Tom's Guide calling it a 'solid choice for stability seekers.' RunRepeat praised its exceptional upper breathability and cushioning for long runs, though noted the outsole design leaves too much foam exposed, potentially affecting durability. While reviewers appreciated the wide platform and secure lockdown, the midsole was described as firm and lacking in energy return compared to modern foams. This shoe is best suited for runners seeking a stable, supportive daily trainer at a reasonable price, but those looking for a more responsive ride may want to consider alternatives like the Brooks Glycerin GTS 21.

Strengths

— Ultra-breathable upper design improves comfort and ventilation
— Excellent pronation control and stable ride for overpronators
— Cushioned enough for long runs and comfortable for walking

Watch-outs

— Too much exposed foam on outsole raises durability concerns
— Midsole feels a bit firm and lacks energy return
— Outsole design doesn't provide sufficient rubber coverage for heavy strikers

$140 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

Hoka Gaviota 6

The Hoka Gaviota 6 provides a roomier fit and better stability than the Saucony Tempus 2, but its outdated CMEVA foam delivers poor shock absorption compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14. It's also more expensive than the Saucony Guide 18 despite offering less energy return.

Saucony Guide 18

The Saucony Guide 18 provides better breathability than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and more pronation control than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's less cushioned than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Hoka Gaviota 6	Saucony Guide 18
Weight	10 oz / 283g	273g (Men's)
Stack Height	39mm heel / 33mm forefoot	36.0 mm
Drop	6mm	8mm
Midsole	CMEVA and PROFLY+	PWRRUN PB
Stability	J-Frame	Guidance Rail
Arch Support	Moderate	Stability

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet