Verdict
All guidesMethodologyAboutContact
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Arahi 8 vs Saucony Tempus 2

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Saucony Tempus 2 comes out ahead by a clear margin (3.5 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about runners with narrow feet wanting energy return — read the strengths below before deciding.

Hoka Arahi 8
Ranked #9 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Hoka Arahi 8
$150

The Hoka Arahi 8 delivers a long-awaited refresh that makes the shoe feel modern again, according to RunRepeat. Reviewers praised its softer foam, wider fit, tall stack, and higher drop that help heel strikers. The shoe now uses the H-Frame stability system from the Gaviota, giving steady support. However, RunRepeat noted a small price increase and poor breathability in hot weather. Jordan Levy from Prevention.com found the Arahi 8 supportive, comfortable, and stable, though not ideal for walking due to its rocker design. This shoe is best for runners seeking mild stability and cushioning, but those training in hot climates or needing superior traction should look elsewhere.

Strengths
  • — Impressively lightweight for its size
  • — Strong shock absorption with 138 SA in heel compared to 106 SA in previous version
  • — Wider fit than previous versions
Watch-outs
  • — Very poor breathability
  • — Grip needs to improve, especially on wet surfaces
$150 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →
Saucony Tempus 2
Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Tempus 2
$159

The Saucony Tempus 2 maintains its position as one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, featuring the energetic PWRRUN PB foam that delivers strong energy return. Reviewers praised its stability and durability, with RunRepeat calling it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers seeking a responsive daily trainer. However, the shoe's snug fit, particularly in the forefoot, and lack of breathability were common complaints. DOCTORS OF RUNNING noted the tapered toe box could cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short for a secure fit. This shoe is best suited for runners with narrow to standard feet who prioritize stability and energy return over cushioning and breathability.

Strengths
  • — Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
  • — Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • — Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support
Watch-outs
  • — Poor breathability in upper mesh
  • — Slightly heavier than previous version
  • — Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box
$159 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →

How they stack up

Hoka Arahi 8

The Hoka Arahi 8 is more lightweight than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better stability than the Saucony Guide 18, but it suffers from poor breathability compared to the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. Unlike the Hoka Gaviota 6, it provides better shock absorption but lacks the roomy fit of the Gaviota.

Saucony Tempus 2

The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

SpecHoka Arahi 8Saucony Tempus 2
Weight9.1 oz9.3 oz
Stack Height39.4 mm38 mm
Drop5 mm8 mm
MidsoleCMEVAPWRRUN PB
StabilityH-FrameNeutral
Arch SupportJ-Frame StabilityMedium
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet