Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Arahi 8 vs Hoka Gaviota 6

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Hoka Gaviota 6 comes out ahead by a clear margin (3.5 vs 4.7). The gap is mostly about runners with wide feet needing maximum stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Ranked #9 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Arahi 8

3.5

$150

The Hoka Arahi 8 delivers a long-awaited refresh that makes the shoe feel modern again, according to RunRepeat. Reviewers praised its softer foam, wider fit, tall stack, and higher drop that help heel strikers. The shoe now uses the H-Frame stability system from the Gaviota, giving steady support. However, RunRepeat noted a small price increase and poor breathability in hot weather. Jordan Levy from Prevention.com found the Arahi 8 supportive, comfortable, and stable, though not ideal for walking due to its rocker design. This shoe is best for runners seeking mild stability and cushioning, but those training in hot climates or needing superior traction should look elsewhere.

Strengths

— Impressively lightweight for its size
— Strong shock absorption with 138 SA in heel compared to 106 SA in previous version
— Wider fit than previous versions

Watch-outs

— Very poor breathability
— Grip needs to improve, especially on wet surfaces

$150 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6

4.7

$180

The Hoka Gaviota 6 represents a long-awaited update to a popular stability shoe, offering improved fit and stability features. Reviewers noted its roomy, wide-fit design and excellent medial support, with the engineered mesh upper providing comfort and security. However, lab tests revealed that the CMEVA foam feels outdated, delivering poor shock absorption and low energy return. While it's lighter than most maximal stability shoes, the performance doesn't justify the $180 price point for many runners. The shoe is best suited for those needing maximum stability and wide-foot accommodation, but those seeking a more lively ride should consider alternatives like the Saucony Hurricane 24 or Nike Structure Plus.

Strengths

— Roomy fit compared with most HOKA models, especially accommodating for wide feet
— Excellent stability with full-length H-frame support that provides strong medial stability
— Light weight for a maximal stack height stability shoe at 10 oz

Watch-outs

— Outdated CMEVA foam delivers disappointing shock absorption and energy return
— High price for the performance offered, especially when compared to newer alternatives
— Heel bevel angled medially, which may cause slight firmness in ride

$180 · Buy at hoka.com Full review →

How they stack up

Hoka Arahi 8

The Hoka Arahi 8 is more lightweight than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better stability than the Saucony Guide 18, but it suffers from poor breathability compared to the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. Unlike the Hoka Gaviota 6, it provides better shock absorption but lacks the roomy fit of the Gaviota.

Hoka Gaviota 6

The Hoka Gaviota 6 provides a roomier fit and better stability than the Saucony Tempus 2, but its outdated CMEVA foam delivers poor shock absorption compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14. It's also more expensive than the Saucony Guide 18 despite offering less energy return.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Hoka Arahi 8	Hoka Gaviota 6
Weight	9.1 oz	10 oz / 283g
Stack Height	39.4 mm	39mm heel / 33mm forefoot
Drop	5 mm	6mm
Midsole	CMEVA	CMEVA and PROFLY+
Stability	H-Frame	J-Frame
Arch Support	J-Frame Stability	Moderate

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet