Verdict
All guidesMethodologyAboutContact
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 vs Saucony Tempus 2

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Saucony Tempus 2 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.2 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about runners with narrow feet wanting energy return — read the strengths below before deciding.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25
Ranked #3 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25
$144

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 represents a refined update to a long-standing stability shoe, offering increased cushioning while maintaining its core function. Reviewers noted the 10mm drop and smoother heel transition as key improvements over previous versions. The shoe provides secure fit and consistent medial support, making it ideal for daily training and long runs. However, it's not designed for speed work, with reviewers emphasizing its plush but unresponsive nature. The updated DNA LOFT v3 foam adds comfort but reduces responsiveness, making it better suited for slower, recovery runs rather than fast-paced workouts. This shoe is best for runners seeking moderate stability and cushioning, particularly those who need support for longer distances.

Strengths
  • — More cushioning added with 3mm forefoot and 1mm heel upgrade for smoother ride
  • — 10mm heel-to-toe drop for improved heel transition compared to previous models
  • — Secure fit with thick upper and stiff heel counter for stability
Watch-outs
  • — Not responsive, with midsole feeling less bouncy than other models
  • — Forefoot firms up over longer mileage, reducing plushness
  • — Average durability expectations for daily training shoe
$144 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →
Saucony Tempus 2
Higher ratedRanked #1 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Tempus 2
$159

The Saucony Tempus 2 maintains its position as one of the lightest stability shoes on the market, featuring the energetic PWRRUN PB foam that delivers strong energy return. Reviewers praised its stability and durability, with RunRepeat calling it a 'solid choice' for heel strikers seeking a responsive daily trainer. However, the shoe's snug fit, particularly in the forefoot, and lack of breathability were common complaints. DOCTORS OF RUNNING noted the tapered toe box could cause minor abrasion, and some users found the laces too short for a secure fit. This shoe is best suited for runners with narrow to standard feet who prioritize stability and energy return over cushioning and breathability.

Strengths
  • — Lightest superfoam stability shoe available
  • — Excellent energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • — Very stable ride with firm PWRRUN frame support
Watch-outs
  • — Poor breathability in upper mesh
  • — Slightly heavier than previous version
  • — Overly snug forefoot and narrow toe box
$159 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →

How they stack up

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 offers more cushioning and a smoother ride than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but lacks the energy return and lighter weight of the Saucony Tempus 2. Unlike the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32, it provides a more balanced cushioning experience without the overly thick midsole that feels bottom-heavy.

Saucony Tempus 2

The Saucony Tempus 2 is lighter and more responsive than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better energy return than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but it's less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6 and lacks the breathability of the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. It's also more restrictive than the Saucony Guide 18.

Specs side-by-side

SpecBrooks Adrenaline GTS 25Saucony Tempus 2
Weight10.6 oz9.3 oz
Stack Height37 mm heel / 27 mm forefoot38 mm
Drop10 mm8 mm
MidsoleDNA LOFT v3PWRRUN PB
StabilityModerateNeutral
Arch SupportGuideRailsMedium
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet