Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 vs Hoka Gaviota 6

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Hoka Gaviota 6 comes out ahead by a clear margin (4.2 vs 4.7). The gap is mostly about runners with wide feet needing maximum stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Ranked #3 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

4.2

$144

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 represents a refined update to a long-standing stability shoe, offering increased cushioning while maintaining its core function. Reviewers noted the 10mm drop and smoother heel transition as key improvements over previous versions. The shoe provides secure fit and consistent medial support, making it ideal for daily training and long runs. However, it's not designed for speed work, with reviewers emphasizing its plush but unresponsive nature. The updated DNA LOFT v3 foam adds comfort but reduces responsiveness, making it better suited for slower, recovery runs rather than fast-paced workouts. This shoe is best for runners seeking moderate stability and cushioning, particularly those who need support for longer distances.

Strengths

— More cushioning added with 3mm forefoot and 1mm heel upgrade for smoother ride
— 10mm heel-to-toe drop for improved heel transition compared to previous models
— Secure fit with thick upper and stiff heel counter for stability

Watch-outs

— Not responsive, with midsole feeling less bouncy than other models
— Forefoot firms up over longer mileage, reducing plushness
— Average durability expectations for daily training shoe

$144 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Hoka Gaviota 6

4.7

$180

The Hoka Gaviota 6 represents a long-awaited update to a popular stability shoe, offering improved fit and stability features. Reviewers noted its roomy, wide-fit design and excellent medial support, with the engineered mesh upper providing comfort and security. However, lab tests revealed that the CMEVA foam feels outdated, delivering poor shock absorption and low energy return. While it's lighter than most maximal stability shoes, the performance doesn't justify the $180 price point for many runners. The shoe is best suited for those needing maximum stability and wide-foot accommodation, but those seeking a more lively ride should consider alternatives like the Saucony Hurricane 24 or Nike Structure Plus.

Strengths

— Roomy fit compared with most HOKA models, especially accommodating for wide feet
— Excellent stability with full-length H-frame support that provides strong medial stability
— Light weight for a maximal stack height stability shoe at 10 oz

Watch-outs

— Outdated CMEVA foam delivers disappointing shock absorption and energy return
— High price for the performance offered, especially when compared to newer alternatives
— Heel bevel angled medially, which may cause slight firmness in ride

$180 · Buy at hoka.com Full review →

How they stack up

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 offers more cushioning and a smoother ride than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but lacks the energy return and lighter weight of the Saucony Tempus 2. Unlike the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32, it provides a more balanced cushioning experience without the overly thick midsole that feels bottom-heavy.

Hoka Gaviota 6

The Hoka Gaviota 6 provides a roomier fit and better stability than the Saucony Tempus 2, but its outdated CMEVA foam delivers poor shock absorption compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14. It's also more expensive than the Saucony Guide 18 despite offering less energy return.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25	Hoka Gaviota 6
Weight	10.6 oz	10 oz / 283g
Stack Height	37 mm heel / 27 mm forefoot	39mm heel / 33mm forefoot
Drop	10 mm	6mm
Midsole	DNA LOFT v3	CMEVA and PROFLY+
Stability	Moderate	J-Frame
Arch Support	GuideRails	Moderate

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet