Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14 vs Saucony Hurricane 25

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.

The short answer

ASICS GT-2000 14 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.5 vs 4.3). ASICS GT-2000 14 is best for: runners wanting balanced support and durability. Read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14

4.5

2 sources$109.95as of Oct 23

The ASICS GT-2000 14 is a stability daily trainer that swapped FF Blast+ for FF Blast Max and got softer and bouncier for it. RunRepeat scored it 87 out of 100 and Road Trail Run 9.5 out of 10. Support comes from geometry rather than a medial post, the outsole is durable, and the toebox is tapered enough to rule the shoe out for wide feet.

Strengths

— Improved FF Blast Max foam provides stronger shock absorption with 132 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot
— Outstanding outsole durability with dependable traction for everyday use
— Full-length medial stability system offers consistent support from heel to forefoot

Watch-outs

— Tapered toebox may feel restrictive and limits toe splay, especially for those needing extra room

$109.95 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Hurricane 25

4.3

4 sources$93.07as of Oct 23

RunRepeat's lab tests show real gains for the Saucony Hurricane 25 in energy return, cushioning, and comfort, and it sheds a full ounce along the way. Doctors of Running praised the bouncy, soft ride and the lighter profile against previous versions, while noting the softer midsole can feel mushy and less stable. The redesigned midsole and improved geometry make for a smoother ride than the Hurricane 24, which suits daily trainers who want plush comfort with stability. Reviewers criticized the breathability and the bulk, both of which count against runners chasing agility or a lower price. It fits people who value maximal cushioning and stability over lightweight responsiveness.

Strengths

— Fantastic energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
— Lighter than previous version at 10 oz
— Excellent cushioning for long miles with 151 SA heel shock absorption

Watch-outs

— Price hike from previous version at $169.95
— Lacks agility and feels clunky for transitions

$93.07 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

ASICS GT-2000 14

The ASICS GT-2000 14 offers better shock absorption than the Hoka Arahi 8 and provides more consistent support from heel to forefoot than the Saucony Guide 18. However, it's less breathable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and has a more restrictive toebox than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Saucony Hurricane 25

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers better energy return than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and provides more stability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Tempus 2. Compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14, it offers a more responsive ride but less consistent support.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	ASICS GT-2000 14	Saucony Hurricane 25
Weight	9.6 oz	10 oz
Stack Height	36.5 mm heel / 28.5 mm forefoot	40.2 mm
Drop	8 mm	7.1 mm
Midsole	FF Blast Max foam	PWRRUN PB foam
Stability	GuideTrac	Guidesole
Arch Support	Medium	Medium
Upper	Engineered mesh	Engineered mesh
Outsole	AHAR rubber	XT-900 carbon rubber
Dimensions	12.44 x 6.3 x 4.75 inches; 1.44 pounds	—
Tech	—	CenterPath stability

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet