Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14 vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

ASICS GT-2000 14 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 score essentially the same (4.2 vs 4.2). Pick the one whose trade-offs match your priorities — the strengths and watch-outs below are where they actually differ.

Ranked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14

4.2

$140

The ASICS GT-2000 14 remains a reliable stability shoe, with RTINGS.com calling it 'one of the most dependable stability shoes you can buy.' The switch to FF Blast Max foam improves shock absorption and energy return compared to previous versions, while the outsole offers exceptional durability. However, the narrow and tapered toebox limits ventilation and may feel restrictive for some runners, as noted by both RunRepeat and Doctors of Running. This shoe is best suited for runners with moderate to high stability needs who want a balanced, supportive daily trainer rather than those seeking maximum cushioning or a more energetic ride.

Strengths

— Improved FF Blast Max foam provides stronger shock absorption with 132 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot
— Outstanding outsole durability with dependable traction for everyday use
— Full-length medial stability system offers consistent support from heel to forefoot

Watch-outs

— Tapered toebox may feel restrictive and limits toe splay, especially for those needing extra room
— Limited breathability due to dense upper material, which can feel warm during long runs

$140 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Ranked #3 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

4.2

$144

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 represents a refined update to a long-standing stability shoe, offering increased cushioning while maintaining its core function. Reviewers noted the 10mm drop and smoother heel transition as key improvements over previous versions. The shoe provides secure fit and consistent medial support, making it ideal for daily training and long runs. However, it's not designed for speed work, with reviewers emphasizing its plush but unresponsive nature. The updated DNA LOFT v3 foam adds comfort but reduces responsiveness, making it better suited for slower, recovery runs rather than fast-paced workouts. This shoe is best for runners seeking moderate stability and cushioning, particularly those who need support for longer distances.

Strengths

— More cushioning added with 3mm forefoot and 1mm heel upgrade for smoother ride
— 10mm heel-to-toe drop for improved heel transition compared to previous models
— Secure fit with thick upper and stiff heel counter for stability

Watch-outs

— Not responsive, with midsole feeling less bouncy than other models
— Forefoot firms up over longer mileage, reducing plushness
— Average durability expectations for daily training shoe

$144 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

ASICS GT-2000 14

The ASICS GT-2000 14 offers better shock absorption than the Hoka Arahi 8 and provides more consistent support from heel to forefoot than the Saucony Guide 18. However, it's less breathable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and has a more restrictive toebox than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 offers more cushioning and a smoother ride than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but lacks the energy return and lighter weight of the Saucony Tempus 2. Unlike the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32, it provides a more balanced cushioning experience without the overly thick midsole that feels bottom-heavy.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	ASICS GT-2000 14	Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25
Weight	9.6 oz / 273 g (men's size 9)	10.6 oz
Stack Height	36.5 mm heel / 28.5 mm forefoot	37 mm heel / 27 mm forefoot
Drop	8 mm	10 mm
Midsole	FF Blast Max foam	DNA LOFT v3
Stability	GuideTrac	Moderate
Arch Support	Medium	GuideRails

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet