Verdict
All guidesMethodologyAboutContact
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs Hoka Gaviota 6

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Hoka Gaviota 6 comes out ahead by a clear margin (4.3 vs 4.7). The gap is mostly about runners with wide feet needing maximum stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
Ranked #7 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
$165

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 delivers on its reputation as a stability powerhouse with improved durability and shock absorption, according to RunRepeat's review. Tom's Guide noted its thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, though the firmer foam and low energy return stand out. The shoe's reduced drop makes it more suitable for midfoot and forefoot strikers. However, reviewers criticized its lack of energy return and premium pricing, especially in Europe. It's ideal for heavier runners seeking comfort and support but not for those wanting a lively ride.

Strengths
  • — Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
  • — Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
  • — Dependable for most pronators with stable support
Watch-outs
  • — Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
  • — Overpriced in Europe
  • — Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight
$165 · Check Price on AmazonFull review →
Hoka Gaviota 6
Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Hoka Gaviota 6
$180

The Hoka Gaviota 6 represents a long-awaited update to a popular stability shoe, offering improved fit and stability features. Reviewers noted its roomy, wide-fit design and excellent medial support, with the engineered mesh upper providing comfort and security. However, lab tests revealed that the CMEVA foam feels outdated, delivering poor shock absorption and low energy return. While it's lighter than most maximal stability shoes, the performance doesn't justify the $180 price point for many runners. The shoe is best suited for those needing maximum stability and wide-foot accommodation, but those seeking a more lively ride should consider alternatives like the Saucony Hurricane 24 or Nike Structure Plus.

Strengths
  • — Roomy fit compared with most HOKA models, especially accommodating for wide feet
  • — Excellent stability with full-length H-frame support that provides strong medial stability
  • — Light weight for a maximal stack height stability shoe at 10 oz
Watch-outs
  • — Outdated CMEVA foam delivers disappointing shock absorption and energy return
  • — High price for the performance offered, especially when compared to newer alternatives
  • — Heel bevel angled medially, which may cause slight firmness in ride
$180 · Buy at hoka.comFull review →

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

Hoka Gaviota 6

The Hoka Gaviota 6 provides a roomier fit and better stability than the Saucony Tempus 2, but its outdated CMEVA foam delivers poor shock absorption compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14. It's also more expensive than the Saucony Guide 18 despite offering less energy return.

Specs side-by-side

SpecASICS Gel-Kayano 32Hoka Gaviota 6
Weight10.4 oz / 295g10 oz / 283g
Stack Height39.9 mm39mm heel / 33mm forefoot
Drop8 mm6mm
MidsoleFF BLAST PLUS ECOCMEVA and PROFLY+
StabilityYesJ-Frame
Arch SupportMediumModerate
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet