Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs ASICS GT-2000 14

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.2). The gap is mostly about heavier runners needing maximum support and durability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #7 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

4.3

$165

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 delivers on its reputation as a stability powerhouse with improved durability and shock absorption, according to RunRepeat's review. Tom's Guide noted its thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, though the firmer foam and low energy return stand out. The shoe's reduced drop makes it more suitable for midfoot and forefoot strikers. However, reviewers criticized its lack of energy return and premium pricing, especially in Europe. It's ideal for heavier runners seeking comfort and support but not for those wanting a lively ride.

Strengths

— Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
— Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
— Dependable for most pronators with stable support

Watch-outs

— Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
— Overpriced in Europe
— Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight

$165 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Ranked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS GT-2000 14

4.2

$140

The ASICS GT-2000 14 remains a reliable stability shoe, with RTINGS.com calling it 'one of the most dependable stability shoes you can buy.' The switch to FF Blast Max foam improves shock absorption and energy return compared to previous versions, while the outsole offers exceptional durability. However, the narrow and tapered toebox limits ventilation and may feel restrictive for some runners, as noted by both RunRepeat and Doctors of Running. This shoe is best suited for runners with moderate to high stability needs who want a balanced, supportive daily trainer rather than those seeking maximum cushioning or a more energetic ride.

Strengths

— Improved FF Blast Max foam provides stronger shock absorption with 132 SA in the heel and 110 SA in the forefoot
— Outstanding outsole durability with dependable traction for everyday use
— Full-length medial stability system offers consistent support from heel to forefoot

Watch-outs

— Tapered toebox may feel restrictive and limits toe splay, especially for those needing extra room
— Limited breathability due to dense upper material, which can feel warm during long runs

$140 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

ASICS GT-2000 14

The ASICS GT-2000 14 offers better shock absorption than the Hoka Arahi 8 and provides more consistent support from heel to forefoot than the Saucony Guide 18. However, it's less breathable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and has a more restrictive toebox than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	ASICS Gel-Kayano 32	ASICS GT-2000 14
Weight	10.4 oz / 295g	9.6 oz / 273 g (men's size 9)
Stack Height	39.9 mm	36.5 mm heel / 28.5 mm forefoot
Drop	8 mm	8 mm
Midsole	FF BLAST PLUS ECO	FF Blast Max foam
Stability	Yes	GuideTrac
Arch Support	Medium	Medium

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet