The Hoover PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704 received mixed reviews regarding its performance. While it offers good suction and easier maintenance compared to similarly priced models, it scored poorly in stain cleaning tests, particularly for upright stains. Tom's Hardware noted it performed worse than the standard PowerDash Pet and Bissell TurboClean in stain tests. However, Reddit users praised its lightweight design and ease of use, with one reviewer noting it's been reliable for over four years. This product suits users seeking a compact, easy-to-maintain cleaner but may not be ideal for those requiring strong stain removal capabilities.
Full review
Performance in Real-World Testing
Consumer Reports tested the Hoover PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704 and found it to be a capable machine for its size, though not without notable limitations. The unit achieved a 3.2/5 rating based on their evaluation criteria, which included suction power, stain cleaning, moisture extraction, area coverage, maintenance, and versatility. In their suction test, the PowerDash Pet+ measured only 1.93 kPa at the nozzle, significantly lower than the 2.28 kPa of the standard PowerDash and 2.40 kPa of the Bissell TurboClean. This low suction performance was particularly evident when tackling tough stains like peanut butter, ice cream, and chocolate syrup, where it required more passes than competitors to achieve acceptable results. The PowerDash Pet+ scored 53 out of 100 in the upright stain test, compared to 34 for the standard PowerDash and 36 for the Bissell TurboClean, indicating subpar performance in this critical area.
The cleaning path width of the PowerDash Pet+ was measured at 7.5 inches, which is notably narrower than most full-size carpet cleaners that typically measure at least 10 inches. This limitation affects its efficiency when cleaning larger areas, requiring more back-and-forth passes to cover the same ground. In moisture extraction tests, the unit left carpets at 27% moisture after cleaning, which is average, but the additional dry passes reduced this to 25%, showing good extraction capabilities. However, the machine's inability to handle tough stains effectively and its narrow cleaning path significantly impacted its overall performance rating, leading Consumer Reports to conclude that they generally do not recommend this model.
Build Quality and Design Features
Hoover's PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704 demonstrates solid build quality with several design features that enhance usability. The unit weighs 13 pounds, making it lightweight and easy to maneuver, particularly for users who need to carry it upstairs or transport it frequently. The compact design includes a 10-foot power cord, which is shorter than most competitors, potentially limiting placement flexibility. The clean water tank capacity is 78 ounces, while the dirty water tank holds 52 ounces, both of which are larger than the standard PowerDash Pet model. The machine's design allows for easy access to the brushroll compartment, enabling users to clean it without tools, a feature that Consumer Reports noted as particularly helpful for maintenance.
The PowerDash Pet+ includes a simple one-touch filling system for both clean water and cleaning solution tanks, eliminating the need for precise measurements. The unit's handle installation requires a specific procedure involving a push pin, which must be properly seated for the dispensing trigger to function correctly. According to Hoover's troubleshooting guide, improper handle installation is a common cause of dispensing issues, and users must ensure the clean water tank is properly seated after removing it. The machine's design includes a nozzle that can be removed for cleaning, which helps prevent clogs and maintains optimal performance. However, the lack of accessories for cleaning furniture or stairs, and no hose connection port, limits its versatility in comparison to full-sized models.
What Reviewers Loved
Several reviewers praised the Hoover PowerDash Pet+ for its ease of use and maintenance. PocketfulofJoules reviewer Joules, who has used the unit since 2019, described it as 'so easy' to operate and noted that it has become 'SO. DANG. EASY' to clean carpets after purchasing it. The reviewer highlighted that the unit's lightweight design (13 pounds) makes it convenient for moving between floors, and the detachable components make cleaning the dirty water tank and brushroll straightforward. The reviewer also appreciated the simple filling system, which requires no measuring, and the fact that the machine has lasted four years without needing replacement parts. This longevity and ease of use were particularly appreciated by users who previously rented carpet cleaners from Home Depot, finding the PowerDash Pet+ to be a cost-effective alternative that eliminated the need for rental fees.
Top Ten Reviews also emphasized the machine's lightweight nature and maneuverability, rating it highly for ease of transport. The reviewer noted that it was the easiest to transport among all tested machines and received a perfect score for maneuverability, making it ideal for users who need to clean carpets in tight spaces or move the unit frequently. The machine's ability to remove 24 ounces of water at once was also praised, as it helped prevent soggy carpets. Additionally, the PowerDash Pet+ was noted for its low noise level compared to other carpet cleaners, with only two competitors producing less sound: the Bissell PowerLifter Powerbrush and the Rug Doctor Deep Carpet Cleaner. The reviewer concluded that despite its limitations, the PowerDash Pet+ offers impressive performance for its price point, especially for pet owners.
Where It Falls Short
Despite its strengths, the Hoover PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704 has several significant drawbacks that prevent it from being a top-tier choice. Consumer Reports specifically criticized its poor performance in stain cleaning, particularly with tough substances like peanut butter, ice cream, and chocolate syrup, where it required more passes than competitors to achieve acceptable results. The unit's narrow cleaning path of 7.5 inches limits its efficiency when covering larger areas, requiring more time and effort. Additionally, the machine's suction power at the nozzle was measured at only 1.93 kPa, significantly lower than the 2.28 kPa of the standard PowerDash and 2.40 kPa of the Bissell TurboClean, which impacts its overall cleaning effectiveness.
The PowerDash Pet+ also lacks essential accessories for comprehensive cleaning, such as a hose connection for spot cleaning and tools for cleaning furniture or stairs. This limitation means that users must rely on other methods for thorough carpet care, which can be inconvenient. Furthermore, some users have reported issues with the unit not dispensing water or solution properly, which can be resolved by ensuring correct handle installation and tank seating. According to Hoover's troubleshooting guide, users must press the push pin on the back of the unit after removing the clean water tank and reinstall the handle base until it clicks into place. These issues, while fixable, can be frustrating for users who expect reliable performance from their cleaning equipment.
Who It's Best For
The Hoover PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704 is best suited for pet owners who need a lightweight, easy-to-use carpet cleaner for regular maintenance and spot cleaning. Users who frequently clean small areas or have limited storage space will appreciate its compact design and ease of storage. The machine's ability to cover a larger area than similarly priced models before requiring a refill of the clean tank or emptying of the dirty water tank makes it ideal for households with moderate carpet usage. Additionally, the unit's simple one-touch filling system and easy maintenance features make it an excellent choice for users who want a hassle-free cleaning experience without the need for complex setup or frequent maintenance.
However, this machine is not recommended for users who require high suction power or need to tackle tough stains regularly. Those who frequently clean large areas or require comprehensive cleaning capabilities should look elsewhere, as the narrow cleaning path and limited accessories may not meet their needs. The PowerDash Pet+ is also not ideal for users who need to clean furniture or stairs, as it lacks the necessary attachments for these tasks. Users who prioritize performance over convenience should consider full-sized carpet cleaners, which offer superior cleaning power and versatility, though at a higher cost and with more complexity.
How It Compares to Alternatives
When compared to similar models, the Hoover PowerDash Pet+ stands out for its ease of maintenance and larger area coverage, but falls short in terms of suction power and stain cleaning performance. Consumer Reports found that while the PowerDash Pet+ had a larger clean water tank and used less water per square foot, it performed worse in stain cleaning tests than both the standard PowerDash and Bissell TurboClean. The PowerDash Pet+ scored 53 out of 100 in the upright stain test, compared to 34 for the standard PowerDash and 36 for the Bissell TurboClean, indicating that it lacks the cleaning power needed for tough stains.
In comparison to the standard PowerDash Pet, the PowerDash Pet+ offers slightly larger tanks and better area coverage, but the performance differences are minimal. The PowerDash Pet+ also has a larger dirty water tank than the standard model, allowing for more coverage before needing to empty it. However, its narrow cleaning path of 7.5 inches is the same as the standard model, limiting its efficiency for large area cleaning. The PowerDash Pet+ also lacks the accessories for cleaning furniture or stairs, which are present in some competing models. While the PowerDash Pet+ is easier to maintain than the standard PowerDash Pet, its performance in stain cleaning is significantly worse, making it less suitable for users who need a high-performance machine.
Value at This Price
At approximately $119, the Hoover PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704 offers good value for users who prioritize convenience and ease of use over maximum cleaning performance. The unit's lightweight design, simple filling system, and easy maintenance features make it an attractive option for households that need a reliable, low-maintenance carpet cleaner. PocketfulofJoules reviewer Joules noted that the machine has lasted four years without needing replacement parts, making it a cost-effective investment compared to renting carpet cleaners from Home Depot, which typically cost around $40 per rental. The machine's ability to cover a larger area than similarly priced models before requiring a refill or emptying also adds to its value proposition.
However, the PowerDash Pet+'s poor performance in stain cleaning and its narrow cleaning path limit its value for users who require high-performance cleaning capabilities. The machine's suction power at the nozzle was measured at only 1.93 kPa, significantly lower than competitors, which impacts its effectiveness. While the unit's price point makes it accessible to budget-conscious consumers, those seeking maximum cleaning performance should consider investing in full-sized carpet cleaners, which offer superior cleaning power and versatility, though at a higher cost.
Long-Term Durability
Based on user feedback and reviews, the Hoover PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704 demonstrates good long-term durability, particularly when compared to rental carpet cleaners that users often find unreliable. PocketfulofJoules reviewer Joules, who has used the unit since 2019, reported that it has performed 'as perfectly as the day I got it' and has lasted four years without needing replacement parts. The reviewer noted that the machine's simple design and easy maintenance features contribute to its longevity, making it a cost-effective alternative to renting carpet cleaners from Home Depot. The unit's lightweight design and compact size also make it easy to store and transport, reducing wear and tear on the machine over time.
However, some users have reported issues with the unit not dispensing water or solution properly, which can be resolved through proper handle installation and tank seating. According to Hoover's troubleshooting guide, users must press the push pin on the back of the unit after removing the clean water tank and reinstall the handle base until it clicks into place. While these issues are fixable, they can be frustrating for users who expect reliable performance from their cleaning equipment. The machine's overall durability is also affected by its lack of accessories for cleaning furniture or stairs, which may limit its usefulness over time. Despite these limitations, the PowerDash Pet+ remains a solid choice for users who prioritize convenience and ease of use.
Strengths
- +Very good suction at the nozzle for the price
- +Able to cover a larger area than similarly priced models before you need to refill its clean tank or empty its dirty water tank
- +Easier to clean and maintain than most similarly priced models
- +Has a larger area of coverage per clean tank than the Bissell TurboClean
Watch-outs
- −Has a very narrow cleaning path
- −Didn't perform well in upright stain test
How it compares
The Hoover PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704 stands out for its lightweight design and ease of maintenance compared to the Bissell ProHeat 2x Revolution Pet Pro Plus 3588F and Bissell Big Green Pet Pro 3288, but it performs poorly in stain tests, especially upright stains, unlike the Bissell Revolution HydroSteam 4120 which uses steam for better results.
Who this is for
At a glance: Compact users seeking easy maintenance and portability.
Why you’d buy the Hoover PowerDash Pet+ Compact FH50704
- Very good suction at the nozzle for the price.
- Able to cover a larger area than similarly priced models before you need to refill its clean tank or empty its dirty water tank.
- Easier to clean and maintain than most similarly priced models.
Why you’d skip it
- Has a very narrow cleaning path.
- Didn't perform well in upright stain test.
Rating sources
“The PowerDash Pet+ performed the worst of the three compact cleaners we tested in our upright stain test, by a sizable margin.”
“I have the same issue , used it only 3 times Jun 30, 2022 by wolfie53077”
Our 3.6 score is the average of these published ratings. Ratings marked * were derived from the reviewer’s written analysis or video transcript — the publisher didn’t print an explicit numeric score, so we inferred one from their own words. Click through to verify. More about methodology.
