Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Instant-film-cameras

Fujifilm Instax Mini 40 vs Fujifilm Instax Wide 400

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Fujifilm Instax Mini 40 comes out ahead by a clear margin (3.8 vs 3.4). The gap is mostly about aesthetics-focused casual users — read the strengths below before deciding.

Fujifilm Instax Mini 40
Higher ratedRanked #2 in Best Instant-film-cameras
Fujifilm Instax Mini 40
$109.95as of Jul 5

The Fujifilm Instax Mini 40 is a stylish camera that offers little innovation over previous Instax models, described as a repackage of familiar features in an attractive package. Reviewers noted its ease of use and automatic exposure control, but criticized its lack of advancement and cheap plastic construction. While it's visually appealing and functional for basic instant photography, reviewers suggest looking elsewhere for better value or features, with competitors like Lomography and MiNT being more appealing options. The camera is designed for users who prioritize aesthetics over innovation.

Strengths
  • Very nice looking design with a leatherette finish
  • Easy to use with simple film loading and operation
  • Automatic exposure control that produces well-exposed images
Watch-outs
  • No significant innovations compared to previous Instax models
  • Plastic build quality that feels cheap and fragile
Fujifilm Instax Wide 400
Ranked #5 in Best Instant-film-cameras
Fujifilm Instax Wide 400
$168as of Jul 5

The Fujifilm Instax Wide 400 is a basic point-and-shoot camera that maintains the same core design as its predecessors, offering minimal controls and a manual focus system. While it's a step back from the Instax Wide 300 in terms of functionality, reviewers noted its expanded selfie timer and LED display as notable additions. The camera's large, bulky form factor and lack of modern conveniences make it less appealing for serious users, though its low price point makes it accessible for casual photography. It's best suited for those seeking a simple, no-frills instant camera experience.

Strengths
  • Simple point-and-shoot design suitable for casual users
  • Includes expanded selfie timer functionality with flick-to-trigger and foot
  • Features a nifty LED display for basic camera feedback
Watch-outs
  • Lacks manual controls like flash on/off or exposure compensation
  • Manual focus system with no indicators or sensors to assist
  • Bulky and awkward design that is difficult to hold and transport

How they stack up

Fujifilm Instax Mini 40

The Fujifilm Instax Mini 40 offers a more stylish design than the Mini 12 but lacks innovation, making it less compelling than the Evo which provides digital features and smartphone connectivity. While it's more visually appealing than the SQ6, it doesn't match the SQ6's analog simplicity and better build quality. Compared to the SQ1, it's more expensive and less practical despite its attractive finish.

Fujifilm Instax Wide 400

The Fujifilm Instax Wide 400 is bulkier than the SQ6 but offers more features like a selfie timer and LED display, though it's less user-friendly due to its manual focus system. Compared to the Mini 12, it lacks the automatic exposure system and is more awkward to handle. Unlike the Evo, it doesn't offer digital connectivity or smartphone integration, making it less versatile for modern users.

Specs side-by-side

SpecFujifilm Instax Mini 40Fujifilm Instax Wide 400
Film FormatInstax MiniInstax Wide
Lens60mm f/12Retractable lens, 2 components, 2 elements
Shutter Speed1/250th max1/64 to 1/200 seconds
Battery Type2 AA4 AA
FlashConstant firing flash (automatic light adjustment)Automatic flash
Dimensions104 mm × 121 mm × 65 mm162 mm × 98 mm × 123 mm
Weight330 g600 g
← See the full ranking of best instant-film-cameras