Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 vs Saucony Hurricane 25

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

Saucony Hurricane 25 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.2 vs 4.3). The gap is mostly about runners wanting maximal cushioning and stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Ranked #3 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

4.2

$144

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 represents a refined update to a long-standing stability shoe, offering increased cushioning while maintaining its core function. Reviewers noted the 10mm drop and smoother heel transition as key improvements over previous versions. The shoe provides secure fit and consistent medial support, making it ideal for daily training and long runs. However, it's not designed for speed work, with reviewers emphasizing its plush but unresponsive nature. The updated DNA LOFT v3 foam adds comfort but reduces responsiveness, making it better suited for slower, recovery runs rather than fast-paced workouts. This shoe is best for runners seeking moderate stability and cushioning, particularly those who need support for longer distances.

Strengths

— More cushioning added with 3mm forefoot and 1mm heel upgrade for smoother ride
— 10mm heel-to-toe drop for improved heel transition compared to previous models
— Secure fit with thick upper and stiff heel counter for stability

Watch-outs

— Not responsive, with midsole feeling less bouncy than other models
— Forefoot firms up over longer mileage, reducing plushness
— Average durability expectations for daily training shoe

$144 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Higher ratedRanked #8 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Hurricane 25

4.3

$169

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers impressive gains in energy return, cushioning, and comfort while shedding a full ounce of weight, according to RunRepeat's lab tests. Doctors of Running praised its bouncy, soft ride and lighter profile compared to previous versions, though they noted the shoe can feel mushy and less stable due to its softer midsole. The redesigned midsole and improved geometry provide a smoother ride than the Hurricane 24, making it ideal for daily trainers seeking plush comfort and stability. However, reviewers criticized its lack of breathability and bulkiness, which may not suit runners prioritizing agility or budget-conscious buyers. This shoe is best for those who value maximal cushioning and stability over lightweight responsiveness.

Strengths

— Fantastic energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
— Lighter than previous version at 10 oz
— Excellent cushioning for long miles with 151 SA heel shock absorption

Watch-outs

— Price hike from previous version at $169.95
— Poor breathability due to flat knit upper
— Lacks agility and feels clunky for transitions

$169 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 offers more cushioning and a smoother ride than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but lacks the energy return and lighter weight of the Saucony Tempus 2. Unlike the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32, it provides a more balanced cushioning experience without the overly thick midsole that feels bottom-heavy.

Saucony Hurricane 25

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers better energy return than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and provides more stability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Tempus 2. Compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14, it offers a more responsive ride but less consistent support.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25	Saucony Hurricane 25
Weight	10.6 oz	10 oz / 283g
Stack Height	37 mm heel / 27 mm forefoot	40.2 mm
Drop	10 mm	7.1 mm
Midsole	DNA LOFT v3	PWRRUN PB foam
Stability	Moderate	Guidesole
Arch Support	GuideRails	Medium

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet