Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs Saucony Hurricane 25

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.
The short answer

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and Saucony Hurricane 25 score essentially the same (4.3 vs 4.3). Pick the one whose trade-offs match your priorities — the strengths and watch-outs below are where they actually differ.

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
Ranked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
4 sources$159.95as of Oct 11

RunRepeat's review confirms the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 lives up to its stability reputation, with better durability and shock absorption than before. Tom's Guide noted the thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, while the firmer foam and low energy return are hard to miss. Its reduced drop makes it a better match for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Reviewers criticized the energy return and the premium price, especially in Europe. Heavier runners who want comfort and support will be well served; anyone who wants a lively ride will not.

Strengths
  • — Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
  • — Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
  • — Dependable for most pronators with stable support
Watch-outs
  • — Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
  • — Overpriced in Europe
  • — Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight
Saucony Hurricane 25
Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Saucony Hurricane 25
4 sources$93.07as of Oct 23

RunRepeat's lab tests show real gains for the Saucony Hurricane 25 in energy return, cushioning, and comfort, and it sheds a full ounce along the way. Doctors of Running praised the bouncy, soft ride and the lighter profile against previous versions, while noting the softer midsole can feel mushy and less stable. The redesigned midsole and improved geometry make for a smoother ride than the Hurricane 24, which suits daily trainers who want plush comfort with stability. Reviewers criticized the breathability and the bulk, both of which count against runners chasing agility or a lower price. It fits people who value maximal cushioning and stability over lightweight responsiveness.

Strengths
  • — Fantastic energy return with PWRRUN PB foam
  • — Lighter than previous version at 10 oz
  • — Excellent cushioning for long miles with 151 SA heel shock absorption
Watch-outs
  • — Price hike from previous version at $169.95
  • — Lacks agility and feels clunky for transitions

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

Saucony Hurricane 25

The Saucony Hurricane 25 delivers better energy return than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and provides more stability than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's heavier and less breathable than the Saucony Tempus 2. Compared to the ASICS GT-2000 14, it offers a more responsive ride but less consistent support.

Specs side-by-side

SpecASICS Gel-Kayano 32Saucony Hurricane 25
Weight10.4 oz10 oz
Stack Height39.9 mm40.2 mm
Drop8 mm7.1 mm
MidsoleFF BLAST PLUS ECOPWRRUN PB foam
StabilityYesGuidesole
Arch SupportMediumMedium
UpperEngineered meshEngineered mesh
OutsoleHYBRID ASICSGRIPXT-900 carbon rubber
Dimensions12.44 x 6.3 x 4.75 inches; 1.44 pounds—
Tech—CenterPath stability
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet