Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs Saucony Guide 18

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.

The short answer

Saucony Guide 18 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.4). The gap is mostly about overpronators seeking affordable stability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

4.3

6 sources$124.95as of Aug 1

RunRepeat's review confirms the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 lives up to its stability reputation, with better durability and shock absorption than before. Tom's Guide noted the thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, while the firmer foam and low energy return are hard to miss. Its reduced drop makes it a better match for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Reviewers criticized the energy return and the premium price, especially in Europe. Heavier runners who want comfort and support will be well served; anyone who wants a lively ride will not.

Strengths

— Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
— Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
— Dependable for most pronators with stable support

Watch-outs

— Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
— Overpriced in Europe
— Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight

$124.95 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Higher ratedRanked #4 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Saucony Guide 18

4.4

8 sources$97.73as of Aug 1

Stability and pronation control are the Saucony Guide 18's job, and Tom's Guide calls it a 'solid choice for stability seekers.' RunRepeat praised the breathable upper and the cushioning on long runs while noting the outsole leaves too much foam exposed, which raises durability questions. Reviewers liked the wide platform and secure lockdown, though the midsole is firm and short on energy return next to modern foams. It fits runners who want a stable, supportive daily trainer at a reasonable price; anyone chasing a more responsive ride should consider the Brooks Glycerin GTS 21.

Strengths

— Ultra-breathable upper design improves comfort and ventilation
— Excellent pronation control and stable ride for overpronators
— Cushioned enough for long runs and comfortable for walking

Watch-outs

— Too much exposed foam on outsole raises durability concerns
— Midsole feels a bit firm and lacks energy return
— Outsole design doesn't provide sufficient rubber coverage for heavy strikers

$97.73 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

Saucony Guide 18

The Saucony Guide 18 provides better breathability than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14 and more pronation control than the Hoka Arahi 8, but it's less cushioned than the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 and lacks the energy return of the Saucony Hurricane 25. It's also less stable than the Hoka Gaviota 6.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	ASICS Gel-Kayano 32	Saucony Guide 18
Weight	10.4 oz	9.63 oz
Stack Height	39.9 mm	36.0 mm
Drop	8 mm	8mm
Midsole	FF BLAST PLUS ECO	PWRRUN PB
Stability	Yes	Guidance Rail
Arch Support	Medium	Stability
Upper	Engineered mesh	Engineered mesh
Outsole	HYBRID ASICSGRIP	XT-900 rubber
Dimensions	12.44 x 6.3 x 4.75 inches; 1.44 pounds	—
Tech	—	CenterPath stability

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet