Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs Hoka Arahi 8

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

Verdict is reader-supported. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Some links on this page are affiliate links — if you click through and buy, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Our ratings are sourced from independent publications, not sponsors.
The short answer

Hoka Arahi 8 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.5). The gap is mostly about heel strikers wanting mild stability and cushioning — read the strengths below before deciding.

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
ASICS Gel-Kayano 32
6 sources$124.95as of Aug 1

RunRepeat's review confirms the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 lives up to its stability reputation, with better durability and shock absorption than before. Tom's Guide noted the thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, while the firmer foam and low energy return are hard to miss. Its reduced drop makes it a better match for midfoot and forefoot strikers. Reviewers criticized the energy return and the premium price, especially in Europe. Heavier runners who want comfort and support will be well served; anyone who wants a lively ride will not.

Strengths
  • Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
  • Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
  • Dependable for most pronators with stable support
Watch-outs
  • Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
  • Overpriced in Europe
  • Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight
Hoka Arahi 8
Higher ratedRanked #3 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet
Hoka Arahi 8
4 sources1 derived$109.99as of Jun 7

RunRepeat says the Hoka Arahi 8 finally feels modern again after a long-awaited refresh. Reviewers praised the softer foam, wider fit, tall stack, and higher drop, all of which help heel strikers. It now borrows the H-Frame stability system from the Gaviota for steady support. RunRepeat also noted a small price increase and poor breathability in hot weather. Jordan Levy from Prevention.com found the Arahi 8 supportive, comfortable, and stable, though the rocker design makes it awkward for walking. Runners who want mild stability and cushioning are the fit; anyone training in hot climates or needing superior traction should look elsewhere.

Strengths
  • Impressively lightweight for its size
  • Strong shock absorption with 138 SA in heel compared to 106 SA in previous version
  • Wider fit than previous versions
Watch-outs
  • Very poor breathability
  • Grip needs to improve, especially on wet surfaces

Derived means the reviewer published no score, so one was inferred from their written verdict. Everything else is a number the publisher printed. How we rank.

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

Hoka Arahi 8

The Hoka Arahi 8 is more lightweight than the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 and offers better stability than the Saucony Guide 18, but it suffers from poor breathability compared to the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14. Unlike the Hoka Gaviota 6, it provides better shock absorption but lacks the roomy fit of the Gaviota.

Specs side-by-side

SpecASICS Gel-Kayano 32Hoka Arahi 8
Weight10.4 oz9.1 oz
Stack Height39.9 mm39.4 mm
Drop8 mm5 mm
MidsoleFF BLAST PLUS ECOCMEVA
StabilityYesH-Frame
Arch SupportMediumJ-Frame Stability
UpperEngineered meshJacquard mesh
OutsoleHYBRID ASICSGRIPDurabrasion rubber
Dimensions12.44 x 6.3 x 4.75 inches; 1.44 pounds
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet