Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 vs Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 comes out ahead by a narrow margin (4.3 vs 4.2). The gap is mostly about heavier runners needing maximum support and durability — read the strengths below before deciding.

Higher ratedRanked #7 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

4.3

$165

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 delivers on its reputation as a stability powerhouse with improved durability and shock absorption, according to RunRepeat's review. Tom's Guide noted its thick, rugged design adds cushioning and stability, though the firmer foam and low energy return stand out. The shoe's reduced drop makes it more suitable for midfoot and forefoot strikers. However, reviewers criticized its lack of energy return and premium pricing, especially in Europe. It's ideal for heavier runners seeking comfort and support but not for those wanting a lively ride.

Strengths

— Amazing shock absorption with 133 SA in the heel and 116 SA in the forefoot
— Made to last with a heavy-duty outsole and excellent grip
— Dependable for most pronators with stable support

Watch-outs

— Bad energy return with only 47.8% score, unsuitable for runners seeking a lively ride
— Overpriced in Europe
— Feels bottom-heavy due to ultra-thick midsole and overall weight

$165 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

Ranked #3 in Best Running Shoes for Flat Feet

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

4.2

$144

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 represents a refined update to a long-standing stability shoe, offering increased cushioning while maintaining its core function. Reviewers noted the 10mm drop and smoother heel transition as key improvements over previous versions. The shoe provides secure fit and consistent medial support, making it ideal for daily training and long runs. However, it's not designed for speed work, with reviewers emphasizing its plush but unresponsive nature. The updated DNA LOFT v3 foam adds comfort but reduces responsiveness, making it better suited for slower, recovery runs rather than fast-paced workouts. This shoe is best for runners seeking moderate stability and cushioning, particularly those who need support for longer distances.

Strengths

— More cushioning added with 3mm forefoot and 1mm heel upgrade for smoother ride
— 10mm heel-to-toe drop for improved heel transition compared to previous models
— Secure fit with thick upper and stiff heel counter for stability

Watch-outs

— Not responsive, with midsole feeling less bouncy than other models
— Forefoot firms up over longer mileage, reducing plushness
— Average durability expectations for daily training shoe

$144 · Check Price on Amazon Full review →

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Kayano 32

The ASICS Gel-Kayano 32 provides superior shock absorption compared to the Hoka Gaviota 6 and Saucony Hurricane 25, but its low energy return makes it less lively than the Saucony Tempus 2. While it's more durable than the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860 v14, it's also heavier and less responsive.

Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25

The Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25 offers more cushioning and a smoother ride than the Saucony Hurricane 25, but lacks the energy return and lighter weight of the Saucony Tempus 2. Unlike the ASICS Gel-Kayano 32, it provides a more balanced cushioning experience without the overly thick midsole that feels bottom-heavy.

Specs side-by-side

Spec	ASICS Gel-Kayano 32	Brooks Adrenaline GTS 25
Weight	10.4 oz / 295g	10.6 oz
Stack Height	39.9 mm	37 mm heel / 27 mm forefoot
Drop	8 mm	10 mm
Midsole	FF BLAST PLUS ECO	DNA LOFT v3
Stability	Yes	Moderate
Arch Support	Medium	GuideRails

← See the full ranking of best running shoes for flat feet