The Philips Lumea IPL 9000 Series IPL Hair removal device with SenseIQ delivers clinically proven, long-lasting smoothness using SmartPulse light technology. Reviewers noted its effectiveness with 4 dedicated attachments for different body areas and SmartSkin sensors for gentle treatment. However, users must shave or wax hair before treatment and the device is ineffective on fine hair colors. The device is designed for long-term hair reduction and includes a personalized Lumea app for tracking treatments.
Full review
Clinical Performance and Results
Philips Lumea IPL 9000 Series devices deliver clinically proven hair reduction results, with the BRI958 model achieving over 86% hair reduction after just two sessions according to manufacturer claims. The Telegraph's Annabel Fenwick Elliott tested the BRI958/00 9000 Series for six months and confirmed these results, noting that the device effectively reduced her leg, bikini, and underarm hair by approximately 80%. The device operates using SmartPulse light technology, which balances light energy, color, and pulse duration to ensure safety, effectiveness, and gentleness. RTINGS tested the device and found that it delivered consistent results across multiple treatment areas, though they noted that the device's effectiveness depends heavily on user compliance with the recommended treatment schedule of every two weeks for initial treatments, then monthly for maintenance. The device's performance is particularly strong for individuals with dark hair and light skin tones, as demonstrated by user testimonials and clinical studies.
The Lumea 9000 Series is designed to provide long-lasting smoothness, with the BRI958 model capable of delivering up to 450,000 flashes, which equates to approximately 39 years of lamp life. This longevity is supported by multiple reviewers, including Nomipalony who used the BRI955 model for nearly three years and reported sustained effectiveness. The device's SmartSkin sensor automatically detects skin tone and recommends the appropriate intensity level from five settings, which improves both safety and user experience. According to a review by the Telegraph, the SmartSkin sensor significantly reduces the risk of improper settings that could lead to skin irritation or ineffective treatments, making it a standout feature compared to previous IPL models. The device also includes a treatment app that helps users track their progress and maintain a consistent regimen, which reviewers found particularly useful for long-term maintenance.
Design and Usability Features
The Philips Lumea 9000 Series features a sleek, ergonomic design that allows for comfortable, cordless operation, though the device is heavier than many competitors and may require frequent recharging. The BRI958/00 model includes four attachments: body, face, bikini, and underarm, each designed to fit specific body contours for optimal treatment. The body attachment has a nearly 5 cm² treatment window, which is significantly larger than the average 3 cm² window found in competing IPL devices, allowing for faster coverage of larger areas. The device's SmartSkin sensor automatically scans skin tone and adjusts intensity, a feature that TechRadar praised for its user-friendliness. However, the device does get quite hot during extended use, as noted by the Telegraph reviewer who recommended taking breaks during long sessions to prevent overheating. The BRI955 model, which the Nomipalony reviewer used, has a slightly different configuration with three attachments, combining the underarm and bikini functions into one, but still maintains the same core functionality and effectiveness.
The device's operation is straightforward, with a simple process of pressing a button after placing it against freshly shaved or waxed skin. The SmartSkin sensor is particularly praised for its ability to recommend the best intensity level based on skin tone, which reduces the risk of improper settings. The device can be used both cordlessly and plugged in, offering flexibility for different usage scenarios. The BRI958/00 model, in particular, includes a feature that allows users to select between 'stamp and flash' for small areas like armpits and 'slide and flash' for larger areas like legs. The device's battery life is sufficient for treating smaller areas but may not last through a full body session, prompting the recommendation to use it with a power cord for extended treatments. The accompanying app provides a structured treatment plan and progress tracking, which reviewers found helpful for maintaining consistency.
User Experience and Comfort
Users consistently report that the Philips Lumea 9000 Series is virtually painless, a significant advantage over other hair removal methods like waxing or threading. The Telegraph's Annabel Fenwick Elliott noted that while there is a slight warm tingling sensation, it is far less uncomfortable than other IPL devices she has tried, with the only exception being the more sensitive bikini area where a mild warmth is felt. The device's SmartPulse technology ensures that the light pulses are gentle and effective, reducing the risk of skin irritation or burns. Nomipalony, who used the BRI955 model for nearly three years, found the device comfortable enough to use regularly, even on sensitive areas. The device's SmartSkin sensor helps prevent overexposure by automatically adjusting the intensity level, which is particularly important for users with darker skin tones or those who are prone to skin sensitivity.
Despite its comfort, the process of using the device is more time-consuming than traditional hair removal methods like shaving. The Telegraph reviewer noted that while it takes longer than shaving, it is still faster than waxing or threading, requiring only about 10 minutes to treat both lower legs. The device's design, while ergonomic, does require users to be thorough in covering all areas, as missing patches can lead to regrowth in those spots. The process of preparing the skin by shaving or waxing before each treatment adds to the overall time investment, but users report that the long-term benefits outweigh this inconvenience. The device's cordless feature is convenient for quick touch-ups but is not recommended for full-body treatments due to battery limitations.
Limitations and Drawbacks
The Philips Lumea 9000 Series has several notable limitations that potential buyers should consider. The device is not suitable for individuals with blonde, ginger, or white/grey hair, as IPL technology works by targeting melanin in the hair, which is absent in these hair types. Additionally, the device cannot be used on skin with freckles, cuts, eczema, or tattoos, and users must avoid using it on areas such as lips, nipples, areolas, labia minora, vagina, anus, or inside nostrils or ears. The device also cannot be used immediately after exposure to AHAs, BHAs, Accutane, or Roaccutane, and users must wait at least two weeks after tanning before using the device. These restrictions can limit the device's usability for some individuals, particularly those with certain skin conditions or hair types. Nomipalony noted that while the device works well for her, it requires strict adherence to the pre-treatment guidelines, which can be tedious and time-consuming.
Another significant drawback is the device's premium price tag, with the BRI958/00 model retailing for £449.99, which is considerably more expensive than many competing IPL devices. The Telegraph reviewer acknowledged that while the device is effective, the cost may not be justified for users who only require occasional hair removal. Additionally, the device's battery life is limited, requiring frequent charging, and the cordless feature is not ideal for full-body treatments. The device also requires a significant time investment for preparation and treatment, as users must shave or wax the area before each session, which can be inconvenient for those with busy schedules. Some reviewers, including those on Mumsnet, noted that the cordless feature is not worth the extra cost for regular use, as it is primarily designed for hard-to-reach areas and not for daily treatments.
Long-Term Durability and Warranty
The Philips Lumea 9000 Series is built for longevity, with a lifespan of 450,000 flashes, which equates to approximately 39 years of lamp life. This impressive durability is supported by multiple reviewers, including Nomipalony, who used the BRI955 model for nearly three years and reported sustained effectiveness. The device comes with a five-year warranty, which provides peace of mind for long-term investment. The BRI958/00 model, in particular, is noted for its robust construction and ability to withstand regular use without significant wear. The device's SmartSkin sensor and SmartPulse technology are designed to maintain consistent performance over time, ensuring that users receive the same level of effectiveness throughout the device's lifespan. The device's build quality is praised by reviewers, with the Telegraph noting that it is built to stand the test of time, making it a worthwhile investment for those seeking long-term hair removal solutions.
The device's longevity is further supported by its ability to handle multiple treatment sessions without degradation in performance. The SmartSkin sensor ensures that the device adapts to changes in skin tone over time, maintaining optimal treatment settings. The device's battery life, while sufficient for smaller treatments, is not ideal for full-body sessions, which may require frequent recharging. However, the device's overall durability and performance consistency make it a reliable choice for users who are committed to long-term hair removal. The accompanying app also helps users track their progress and maintain a consistent regimen, which contributes to the device's long-term effectiveness.
Who It's Best For
The Philips Lumea IPL 9000 Series is best suited for individuals with dark hair and light skin tones who are seeking a long-term, low-maintenance hair removal solution. The device is particularly effective for users who have tried other hair removal methods like shaving, waxing, or threading and are looking for a more permanent alternative. The Telegraph's Annabel Fenwick Elliott, who tested the device for six months, found it ideal for those who hate shaving and cannot tolerate the pain of waxing. The device is also recommended for users who are willing to invest in a premium product and have the time and resources to follow the treatment regimen consistently. Nomipalony, who used the BRI955 model for nearly three years, found the device to be a worthwhile investment for those who want to avoid the hassle of frequent hair removal treatments.
However, the device is not recommended for individuals with blonde, ginger, or white/grey hair, as IPL technology is ineffective on these hair types. Users with certain skin conditions, such as eczema or active tattoos, should also avoid using the device. The device's premium price tag and time investment may not be suitable for those who only require occasional hair removal or are on a tight budget. Additionally, the device's cordless feature is not ideal for full-body treatments, making it less practical for users who need to treat large areas regularly. The device is best suited for individuals who are committed to long-term use and can afford the initial investment and ongoing maintenance.
Comparison to Alternatives
The Philips Lumea 9000 Series stands out among competing IPL devices due to its SmartSkin sensor, which automatically detects skin tone and adjusts intensity levels, a feature that many competitors lack. The device's SmartPulse technology also provides a balanced approach to light energy, color, and pulse duration, ensuring both safety and effectiveness. Compared to other IPL devices, the Lumea 9000 Series offers a larger treatment window (nearly 5 cm²) for faster coverage, which is significantly larger than the average 3 cm² found in competitors. The device's app integration and structured treatment plan also provide an advantage over simpler IPL devices that lack digital tracking features. The Telegraph reviewer noted that while the device is more expensive than some alternatives, its effectiveness and user-friendliness justify the cost for those seeking a long-term solution.
However, some reviewers have noted that the device's premium price and time investment may not be justified for occasional users. The BRI958/00 model, in particular, is more expensive than many competing devices, but offers superior features such as the SmartSkin sensor and larger treatment window. The device's cordless feature is convenient for touch-ups but not ideal for full-body treatments, which may limit its appeal to users who need to treat large areas regularly. In contrast, simpler IPL devices may offer similar results at a lower cost but lack the advanced features and user-friendliness of the Lumea 9000 Series. The device's long-term durability and effectiveness make it a strong contender for users who are committed to long-term hair removal and willing to invest in a premium product.
Strengths
- +Clinically proven to achieve years of salon-like smoothness
- +4 dedicated attachments for face, body, armpits, and bikini areas
- +SmartSkin sensors provide gentle and effective treatment
- +Powered by SmartPulse light technology for long-lasting hair reduction
Watch-outs
- −Requires regular hair removal (shaving or waxing) before treatment
- −Not effective on blonde, ginger, or white/grey hair
How it compares
The Philips Lumea IPL 9000 offers 4 dedicated attachments and SmartSkin sensors, which are more versatile than the basic features of the Braun Silk Expert Pro 5 or Nood The Flasher 2.0. However, it lacks the smart app integration of the Braun Skin i-expert and doesn't provide the ice-cooling comfort of the Ulike Air+.
Who this is for
At a glance: users wanting attachment versatility.
Why you’d buy the Philips Lumea IPL 9000
- Clinically proven to achieve years of salon-like smoothness.
- 4 dedicated attachments for face, body, armpits, and bikini areas.
- SmartSkin sensors provide gentle and effective treatment.
Why you’d skip it
- Requires regular hair removal (shaving or waxing) before treatment.
- Not effective on blonde, ginger, or white/grey hair.
Rating sources
“It’s a robust, effective and advanced solution that’s taken me from very furry to almost completely and permanently hairless.”
“i'm very happy to say that it's actually not that bad... i would just say you know start out maybe on two or three see what you can take”
Our 4.3 score is the average of these published ratings. Ratings marked * were derived from the reviewer’s written analysis or video transcript — the publisher didn’t print an explicit numeric score, so we inferred one from their own words. Click through to verify. More about methodology.
