The Osprey Talon 22 is praised for its comfort and weight distribution, with a padded hipbelt and load lifters that transfer weight effectively. Reviewers noted its supportive semi-rigid backpanel and versatile storage options, though some found it too heavy for ultralight hiking. The pack's design prioritizes comfort over minimalism, making it suitable for day hikes with moderate loads but less ideal for fast-and-light missions or urban commuting. Better Trail rated it 4.8/5, while Jaeger Shaw of Adventure Alan Co. criticized its weight and overbuilt frame.
Full review
Comfort and Support
The Osprey Talon 22 delivers exceptional comfort for a daypack in its class, with reviewers consistently praising its body-hugging fit and supportive design. Better Trail's Jonas Hill noted that the padded hipbelt and breathable mesh backpanel make it ideal for carrying 20 pounds or more on extended hikes, even through challenging terrain like the Picos de Europa. The semi-rigid plastic framesheet provides just enough structure to support loads without feeling overly stiff, and the backpanel's ventilation helps prevent overheating during active use. RTINGS' testing confirmed that the Talon's design effectively isolates wearers from sharp gear like carabiners, while still maintaining adequate airflow. However, Adventure Alan's Jaeger Shaw criticized the pack's weight as excessive for a daypack, arguing that the full internal frame with load lifters isn't necessary for typical day hiking loads, suggesting that the added weight detracts from its overall usability.
CleverHiker's Ian Krammer emphasized the Talon's adjustability, particularly the velcro shoulder straps and adjustable back panel that allow for a customized fit across different torso lengths. The seamless hip belt integration and comfortable shoulder straps were highlighted as key features that prevent pinching and distribute weight effectively. Trail to Peak's Drew Robinson noted that the load lifters are a rare feature in smaller packs, allowing users to release tension when using the pack as a hydration vest and tighten it for heavier loads. The sternum strap and trekking pole attachment were also praised for their practicality, though the small front chest pocket was deemed too limited for larger items like a soft flask. The pack's ability to handle loads up to 20 pounds without feeling overwhelmed was confirmed by multiple reviewers, with the Talon performing better than more minimalist options like the Hyperlite Daybreak 17.
Organization and Storage
The Osprey Talon 22 offers thoughtful and functional storage that strikes a balance between organization and simplicity. Better Trail's review highlighted the wide U-shaped main zipper that makes loading easy, while the internal hydration sleeve with bladder clip was noted as a useful feature for long hikes. The pack includes a small internal zip pocket with key leash for valuables, and the external storage features include two side stretch pockets that fit 1-liter bottles with room to spare. The large rear shove-it pocket was especially appreciated for stashing rain shells or wet layers, and the top zip pocket proved useful for sunglasses or snacks. Trail to Peak's Drew Robinson specifically mentioned the large envelope pocket on top that comfortably fits a camera and spare lens, while the hipbelt pockets were adequate for phones and energy gels. The helmet carry system was noted as a versatile feature, working well with both climbing helmets and biking helmets, and the rear bike light attachment slits were appreciated by urban commuters.
However, some reviewers pointed out limitations in the storage design. Adventure Alan's Jaeger Shaw criticized the lack of a rain cover, noting that Osprey includes this feature on other packs like the Stratos, which he felt was a significant omission for a pack that's meant for outdoor use. The front mesh pocket's flat elastic opening was also mentioned as a design change in the 2025 model that reduced its functionality compared to previous versions. CleverHiker's Ian Krammer emphasized that while the pack has a good overall external storage suite, the hip belt pockets are on the small side, though still adequate for storing a few bars each. The pack's layout was described as dialed for both everyday hikes and more involved missions, but the limited front chest pocket was noted as potentially problematic for users who need to store larger items.
Build Quality and Durability
The Osprey Talon 22 demonstrates robust build quality and longevity, with reviewers noting its ability to withstand years of rigorous use. The Next Summit's Alex Derr reported that after five years and over 60 ascents, the pack maintained its integrity with minimal signs of wear, only experiencing a broken zipper that was easily replaced with a spare provided by Osprey. The core materials include durable 70D nylon and a more robust 420HD nylon panel on the bottom, which provides resistance to wear and tear during use. Better Trail's review confirmed that the pack's construction is suitable for regular abuse, with the materials holding up well under various conditions. The back panel's mesh design was praised for its breathability and protection against sharp objects, while the overall frame structure was noted as providing sufficient support without being overly rigid.
Despite its durability, some reviewers noted specific weaknesses in the build. The 2025 model's weight increase from 30.6 oz to 38.1 oz was a point of criticism, with Adventure Alan's Jaeger Shaw questioning the necessity of the full internal frame for a daypack. The pack's resistance to water was also noted as limited, with Better Trail's review giving it only a 3/5 rating for water resistance, and the lack of a rain cover was highlighted as a design flaw. Trail to Peak's Drew Robinson confirmed that while the pack is not waterproof, it's resistant to light drizzle and fits comfortably under a rain jacket. The pack's materials, while durable, were noted as not being fully waterproof, which may be a concern for users who frequently encounter wet conditions.
Weight and Performance
The Osprey Talon 22 weighs 2 pounds 6.1 ounces, placing it in the middle range for daypacks, which reviewers generally found acceptable for its intended use. Better Trail's review noted that this weight is not burdensome for most day-long adventures, though it's heavier than ultralight options like the REI Co-op Flash 22, which weighs just 14 ounces. The Talon's weight was compared favorably to the Osprey Stratos 24, which weighs 2 pounds 12 ounces and includes a full internal frame, though the added structure in the Stratos was deemed excessive for smaller capacities. Trail to Peak's Drew Robinson reported that the pack's weight is on par with some hydration packs he owns, making it a top choice for quick day hikes. The Talon's ability to carry up to 20 pounds without feeling overwhelmed was confirmed by multiple reviewers, with its performance being superior to more minimalist options like the Hyperlite Daybreak 17.
However, Adventure Alan's Jaeger Shaw criticized the pack's weight as excessive for a daypack, arguing that the full internal frame with load lifters isn't necessary for typical day hiking loads. The pack's weight was also questioned in relation to its functionality, with the reviewer suggesting that the added pound of weight could be better spent on other features or lighter materials. The Talon's performance under load was generally positive, with reviewers noting that it handles gear-dense setups well, though the semi-rigid backpanel was noted as not being as efficient for moving fast as a running vest-style daypack. The pack's ability to maintain comfort under heavy loads was praised, with the padded hipbelt and breathable mesh backpanel contributing to its overall performance.
Where It Falls Short
Despite its many strengths, the Osprey Talon 22 has several notable shortcomings that reviewers have identified. The most consistent criticism comes from Adventure Alan's Jaeger Shaw, who called the pack 'too heavy' and 'conceptually challenged,' questioning the necessity of a full internal frame for a daypack that doesn't typically require such heavy load transfer. The weight increase in the 2025 model from 30.6 oz to 38.1 oz was particularly criticized, with Shaw arguing that the added pound of weight doesn't justify the benefits of the full frame structure. Another significant drawback is the lack of a rain cover, which was noted as a major omission by both Adventure Alan and Better Trail reviewers. The front mesh pocket's flat elastic opening was also criticized as a design change that reduced functionality compared to previous versions. The hip belt pockets were described as being on the small side, though still adequate for their intended use.
The pack's semi-rigid backpanel was also noted as a limitation, with some reviewers suggesting it doesn't fully protect against pointy objects, despite being designed to isolate wearers from sharp gear. The lack of waterproofing was another recurring criticism, with Better Trail's review giving it only a 3/5 rating for water resistance. The pack's urban crossover versatility was also questioned, with Shaw noting that the hip belt makes it less suitable for commuting or urban use. Additionally, while the Talon's features are comprehensive, some reviewers felt that the pack's organization system could be more streamlined, with the front chest pocket being too small for larger items. The pack's performance in scorching heat was also questioned, with Better Trail's reviewer noting that while the airflow has been sufficient in mild to warm conditions, it hasn't been tested in extreme heat.
Who It's Best For
The Osprey Talon 22 is best suited for hikers and outdoor enthusiasts who need a versatile, comfortable daypack for moderate to heavy loads. Better Trail's review identified it as ideal for 'everything from quick summit pushes to all-day hikes,' with its body-hugging fit and supportive design making it particularly well-suited for peak baggers and climbers who need to carry gear and supplies for extended periods. The pack's ability to handle loads up to 20 pounds was noted as a key advantage, with reviewers praising its performance on challenging terrain like the Picos de Europa and coastal trails in Cantabria. The helmet carry system and trekking pole attachments make it especially appealing to mountaineers and bikers who need to carry specialized gear. The pack's versatility was also highlighted by CleverHiker's Ian Krammer, who noted that it's a favorite on their team for its comfort, organization, and durability.
However, the Talon 22 may not be the best choice for ultralight enthusiasts or those who prioritize minimal weight above all else. Adventure Alan's Jaeger Shaw specifically noted that the pack's weight and structure make it less suitable for fast-and-light missions, where a running vest-style daypack like the Talon Velocity series would be more appropriate. The pack's urban crossover versatility was also questioned, with Shaw suggesting that the hip belt makes it less ideal for commuting or urban use. For those seeking a lightweight option, the REI Co-op Flash 22 or Osprey Talon Velocity 20 would be better alternatives. The Talon 22's 22-liter capacity is also not ideal for users who need more space, though it's sufficient for most day hikes and peak bagging scenarios.
How It Compares to Alternatives
The Osprey Talon 22 stands out among daypacks for its balance of comfort, function, and durability, though it faces competition from several other well-regarded models. Better Trail's review compared it favorably to the REI Co-op Flash 22, which weighs just 14 ounces but lacks the structure, support, and ventilation that make the Talon more comfortable under heavier loads. The Flash feels floppier on the back and doesn't handle gear-dense setups nearly as well, though it's more ultralight. The Osprey Stratos 24 was noted as having a full internal frame and more structure, but its added weight was deemed excessive for smaller capacities. The Talon Velocity series was also mentioned as a lighter, sportier alternative, weighing around 1 pound 14 ounces and offering a running-vest-style harness, though it sacrifices some of the Talon 22's versatility and load-carrying comfort. Trail to Peak's Drew Robinson noted that while the Talon's weight is acceptable for day hikes, it's heavier than hydration packs he owns, which he found to be a trade-off for the added comfort and features.
CleverHiker's Ian Krammer and The Next Summit's Alex Derr both emphasized the Talon's superior comfort and organization compared to other daypacks in its class, though they noted that the pack's weight and structure make it less suitable for ultralight enthusiasts. The pack's performance was contrasted with the Hyperlite Daybreak 17, which was praised for its minimalist design but criticized for lacking the padding and ventilation that make the Talon more comfortable. The Talon's ability to handle loads up to 20 pounds was noted as a key advantage over more minimalist options, with reviewers suggesting that the Talon's design is more appropriate for users who need to carry significant gear and supplies.
Value at This Price
At $175, the Osprey Talon 22 represents a premium price point that reflects its quality and feature set, though reviewers have noted that it's not the most budget-friendly option available. Better Trail's review gave it a 4.8/5 rating, noting that its body-hugging fit, just-right cushioning, and versatile 22-liter capacity make it ideal for many outdoor activities. The pack's durability and thoughtful organization were highlighted as key factors that justify its cost, with The Next Summit's Alex Derr noting that after five years and over 60 ascents, the pack maintained its integrity with minimal signs of wear. The inclusion of features like the helmet carry system, trekking pole attachments, and the internal hydration sleeve were all praised as valuable additions that enhance the pack's versatility. The Talon's performance in real-world use was consistently positive, with reviewers noting that it carries surprisingly well for its size and is versatile enough to handle everything from peak bagging to hauling climbing gear.
However, the pack's value proposition was questioned by Adventure Alan's Jaeger Shaw, who criticized the weight increase in the 2025 model and questioned whether the added pound of weight justified the benefits of the full internal frame. The pack's lack of a rain cover was also noted as a design flaw that reduces its value for outdoor enthusiasts who frequently encounter wet conditions. The Talon's price point was also compared to more ultralight alternatives like the REI Co-op Flash 22, which offers the same capacity at a significantly lower weight and cost. While the Talon 22's features and durability make it a solid investment for serious outdoor enthusiasts, those seeking a more budget-conscious option or ultralight performance may find better value in competing products.
Strengths
- +Padded hipbelt transfers weight to hips, reducing shoulder strain
- +Load lifters and full internal frame provide good weight distribution
- +Comfortable backpanel with breathable mesh and foam cushioning
- +Thoughtful external storage with multiple pockets and helmet carry system
Watch-outs
- −Excessively heavy at 2 lb 6.1 oz for a daypack
- −Overbuilt frame not necessary for typical day hiking loads
- −Does not crossover well into urban use due to hip belt design
How it compares
The Osprey Talon 22 offers superior comfort and weight distribution with its padded hipbelt and load lifters, surpassing the Deuter Speed Lite Pro 23 SL in support and the REI Co-op Flash 22 in structural integrity. However, it's heavier than the Wapta 30 and less versatile than the Osprey Tempest 22, which offers better adjustability and a more user-friendly design for technical terrain.
Who this is for
At a glance: hikers carrying moderate loads with comfort priority.
Why you’d buy the Osprey Talon 22 Pack
- Padded hipbelt transfers weight to hips, reducing shoulder strain.
- Load lifters and full internal frame provide good weight distribution.
- Comfortable backpanel with breathable mesh and foam cushioning.
Why you’d skip it
- Excessively heavy at 2 lb 6.1 oz for a daypack.
- Overbuilt frame not necessary for typical day hiking loads.
- Does not crossover well into urban use due to hip belt design.
Rating sources
Our 4.6 score is the average of these published ratings. More about methodology.
