Verdict
Ranked #2 of 7Aggregated review·2 sources·updated October 17, 2026

Cloud RO Under-Sink Reverse Osmosis System

Averaged from 2 derived from review text
The verdict

The Cloud RO is a battery-powered, app-connected under-sink reverse osmosis system with eight filtration stages, remineralisation, a 2.8-gallon tank and a rated 80 gallons per day. The Spruce named it its best smart system after a year of use, citing easy setup, useful app monitoring and alerts, and enough output for a large household; Good Housekeeping found it compact, quiet and noticeably better tasting than NYC tap water. Both flag the cost: Good Housekeeping puts the starting price at about $600 with $200 replacement filters, and The Spruce notes a 1:1 waste ratio. It suits households that want RO water with real-time monitoring; buyers on a budget or short of cabinet space should look elsewhere.

Cloud RO Under-Sink Reverse Osmosis System

Full review

Better-tasting water, tracked in an app

The Spruce's tester used the Cloud RO for a year with a family of three, loved the taste and drank more water as a result, and still had not needed to change the filters. The app shows local water issues, tap and filtered water quality, and the minerals added back during remineralisation, and it sends an alert when filters are due. Good Housekeeping's reviewer, who drank Cloud-filtered water for several weeks in a New York apartment, said it tasted far better than her tap water and liked checking filter and battery status in the app, which is not required for daily use.

Easy to fit, though it still takes space

Both publications found installation straightforward. The Spruce praised the well-labelled lines and fittings, and Good Housekeeping's installer fitted the system in under 30 minutes after drilling a faucet hole through a marble counter. Because it runs on a battery, no under-sink outlet is needed. Good Housekeeping found the two-unit design compact enough to leave room for cleaning supplies, and long cords let the units be arranged to suit the cabinet. The Spruce, however, says the filter and tank took up half its under-sink space, bulkier than its tankless pick, though the 2.8-gallon tank means large bottles can be filled back to back.

Premium price and running costs

The main trade-off is cost. Good Housekeeping puts the starting price at about $600, notes that other RO systems cost a few hundred dollars less, and calls the $200 replacement filters pricier than average, although the brand expects about one filter change a year for a family of four. The Spruce adds that its 1:1 waste ratio is more wasteful than its top iSpring pick, that flow sputters slightly on first use each day, and that the included faucet feels a little flimsy, though the rest of the system felt durable. Good Housekeeping found flow slower than an unfiltered tap but sufficient for glasses, bottles and kettles.

Strengths

  • +The Spruce found setup easy, with well-labelled lines and fittings
  • +App shows tap and filtered water quality and sends filter-change alerts
  • +Battery powered, so no outlet is needed under the sink
  • +2.8-gallon tank lets large bottles be filled back to back
  • +Good Housekeeping found the water tasted noticeably better than NYC tap water

Watch-outs

  • −Costs more than many RO systems, and replacement filters cost about $200
  • −1:1 waste ratio, more wasteful than The Spruce's top iSpring pick
  • −Included faucet feels a little flimsy, and flow sputters on first use each day

How it compares

Unlike the Waterdrop G3P800 Tankless Reverse Osmosis System, the Cloud RO stores water in a 2.8-gallon tank and runs on a battery rather than mains power. Like the APEC Water ROES-PH75 Essence Alkaline system it adds minerals back after RO filtration, but it is priced from about $600 and adds app monitoring; the Aquasana Claryum AQ-5300+ is a non-RO filter for buyers who want to avoid a tank altogether.

Rating sources

Our 4.4 score is the average of these published ratings. Ratings marked * were derived from the reviewer’s written analysis or video transcript — the publisher didn’t print an explicit numeric score, so we inferred one from their own words. Click through to verify. More about methodology.

How it compares

See all 7 →
Waterdrop G3P800 Tankless Reverse Osmosis System
#1 · Top Pick

Waterdrop G3P800 Tankless Reverse Osmosis System

Unlike the Aquasana Claryum AQ-5300+, which the page recommends for keeping minerals in, the G3P800's RO membrane removes nearly all of them unless an add-on remineralization filter is fitted. It also needs an under-sink power outlet and a drain connection. At $759 it is a heavier investment than the Waterdrop 15UA or Frizzlife MP99, both recommended on this page for budget buyers.

APEC Water ROES-PH75 Essence Alkaline Reverse Osmosis System
#3

APEC Water ROES-PH75 Essence Alkaline Reverse Osmosis System

The ROES-PH75 is a reverse osmosis system, unlike the Clearly Filtered 3-Stage Under the Sink, which reduces contaminants without RO, and the Aquasana Claryum AQ-5300+, which is a no-wait filter that keeps healthy minerals. The APEC instead strips most minerals and adds a calcite stage at the end, and it needs a 4-gallon storage tank and a drain connection that sends water to waste.

Aquasana Claryum AQ-5300+
#4

Aquasana Claryum AQ-5300+

Unlike the Clearly Filtered 3-Stage, the AQ-5300+ carries multiple NSF certifications rather than relying on third-party testing alone.

Clearly Filtered 3-Stage Under the Sink
#5

Clearly Filtered 3-Stage Under the Sink

Unrated

The Clearly Filtered 3-Stage Under the Sink is tested to reduce 232+ contaminants including fluoride, which the Frizzlife MP99 and Waterdrop 15UA do not reduce. It holds only one full NSF certification, where the Aquasana Claryum AQ-5300+ is certified to NSF/ANSI 42, 53 and 401. Its 2,000-gallon filter life is longer than the Aquasana's 800 gallons and far shorter than the Waterdrop's 16,000, and it costs far more than all three.

Cloud RO Under-Sink Reverse Osmosis System
4.4/5
Buy at cloudwaterfilters.com
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission. Rankings are not affected.