Verdict
Head-to-head · Best Running Shoes for High Arches

ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 vs Nike Pegasus 42

Which is the better buy? Side-by-side on rating, price, strengths, and watch-outs — with the published ratings we averaged to get there.

The short answer

ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28 and Nike Pegasus 42 score essentially the same (4.5 vs 4.5). Pick the one whose trade-offs match your priorities — the strengths and watch-outs below are where they actually differ.

ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28
Ranked #4 in Best Running Shoes for High Arches
ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28
$140

The Gel-Cumulus 28 is the midfoot-pressure pick — more space through midfoot for high-arch foot shape.

Strengths
  • More space through midfoot — accommodates high arches
  • Less aggressive clamping than daily trainers
  • ASICS rear-foot gel cushion
Watch-outs
  • Less plush than Nimbus
  • Standard width
  • Mid-arch may find it loose
Nike Pegasus 42
Ranked #5 in Best Running Shoes for High Arches
Nike Pegasus 42
$140

The Pegasus 42 is the Nike high-arch pick — daily trainer with forefoot Air Zoom unit.

Strengths
  • Daily-trainer reliability
  • Air Zoom unit at forefoot for high-arch responsiveness
  • Lighter than ASICS Nimbus
Watch-outs
  • Less plush than Brooks Ghost or ASICS Nimbus
  • Narrower toe box
  • Less recommended for high arches than Brooks / ASICS

How they stack up

ASICS Gel-Cumulus 28

More midfoot space. Less plush than Nimbus. Lighter.

Nike Pegasus 42

Lighter than ASICS. Less plush. Air Zoom forefoot.

Specs side-by-side

SpecASICS Gel-Cumulus 28Nike Pegasus 42
Drop8mm10mm
MidfootAccommodating
UseNeutral dailyDaily trainer
BrandASICSNike
FeatureForefoot Air Zoom
← See the full ranking of best running shoes for high arches